首页> 外文期刊>Forest and Society >Transforming forest landscape conflicts: the promises and perils of global forest management initiatives such as REDD+
【24h】

Transforming forest landscape conflicts: the promises and perils of global forest management initiatives such as REDD+

机译:改变森林景观冲突:REDD +等全球森林管理计划的前景和危险

获取原文
           

摘要

Implementation of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is designed to relieve pressure on tropical forests, however, many are concerned that it is a threat to the rights of forest communities. These potential risks need serious attention as earlier studies have shown that the Asia-Pacific region is a forest conflict hotspot, with many economic, environmental and social implications at global (e.g. climate change) to local levels (e.g. poverty). Drawing on an analysis of nine case studies from four countries (Cambodia, Myanmar, Nepal and Vietnam) this paper examines why and how REDD+ can be a driver for forest conflict and how it also has the potential to simultaneously transform these conflicts. The analytical framework, “sources of impairment”, applied in the study was developed to increase understanding and facilitate the resolution of forest landscape conflicts in a sustainable manner (i.e. transformation). The main findings are that REDD+ can be a source of conflict in the study sites, but also had transformative potential when good practices were followed. For example, in some sites, the REDD+ projects were sources of impairment for forest communities by restricting access to forest resources. However, the research also identified REDD+ projects that enabled the participation of traditionally marginalized groups and built local forest management capacities, leading to strengthened tenure for some forest communities. Similarly, in some countries REDD+ has served as a mechanism to pilot Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), which will likely have significant impacts in mitigating conflicts by addressing the sources at local to national levels. Based on these findings, there are many reasons to be optimistic that REDD+ can address the underlying causes of forest landscape conflicts, especially when linked with other governance initiatives such as Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade – Voluntary Participation Agreements (FLEGT-VPA).
机译:减少森林砍伐和森林退化造成的排放量的实施旨在减轻对热带森林的压力,但是,许多人担心这对森林社区的权利构成威胁。这些潜在的风险需要得到认真的关注,因为较早的研究表明,亚太地区是森林冲突的热点,在全球(例如气候变化)和地方(例如贫困)层面都具有许多经济,环境和社会影响。在对来自四个国家(柬埔寨,缅甸,尼泊尔和越南)的九个案例研究进行分析的基础上,本文研究了REDD +为何以及如何成为森林冲突的驱动因素,以及它如何同时改变这些冲突。研究中采用的分析框架“损害源”是为了增进了解并以可持续方式(即转变)促进解决森林景观冲突。主要发现是,REDD +可能是研究场所发生冲突的根源,但如果遵循良好实践,则也具有变革潜力。例如,在某些地点,REDD +项目通过限制对森林资源的获取而成为森林社区的损害源。但是,研究还确定了REDD +项目,这些项目使传统上处于边缘地位的群体得以参与,并建立了当地的森林管理能力,从而增强了一些森林社区的保有权。同样,在某些国家/地区,REDD +已成为试行自由,事先和知情同意(FPIC)的机制,这可能会通过解决地方到国家层面的来源而对缓解冲突产生重大影响。基于这些发现,有很多理由使REDD +能够解决森林景观冲突的根本原因,尤其是与诸如森林执法,治理和贸易–自愿参与协议(FLEGT-VPA)之类的其他治理计划相联系时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号