首页> 外文期刊>Forests >Does REDD+ Ensure Sectoral Coordination and Stakeholder Participation? A Comparative Analysis of REDD+ National Governance Structures in Countries of Asia-Pacific Region
【24h】

Does REDD+ Ensure Sectoral Coordination and Stakeholder Participation? A Comparative Analysis of REDD+ National Governance Structures in Countries of Asia-Pacific Region

机译:REDD +是否确保部门协调和利益相关者的参与?亚太地区国家REDD +国家治理结构的比较分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+) requires harmonizing different policy sectors and interests that have impacts on forests. However, these elements have not been well-operationalized in environmental policy-making processes of most developing countries. Drawing on five cases—Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Papua New Guinea, and Vietnam, this article aims to determine whether emerging governance arrangements help REDD+ development by delivering participatory mechanisms for policy coordination. Building upon literature on environmental governance and stakeholder participation, the article examines national governance structures for REDD+ and identifies who participates where, and what decision-making powers they have. Despite structural differences between the countries, our analysis illustrates that REDD+ potentially encourages a new form of environmental governance promoting a cross-sectoral approach and stakeholder participation. Cohesiveness of the structures within a broader governance system is key to defining the capacity of REDD+ governance. The result also poses a question as to the inclusiveness of the state actors involved in order to tackle the different pressure on forests. Considering structural inequalities, the analysis further suggests a need of policy support for those who are affected by REDD+ to ensure that their voices could be heard in decision-making processes.
机译:减少发展中国家的森林砍伐和森林退化造成的排放(REDD +)要求协调对森林有影响的不同政策部门和利益。但是,这些要素在大多数发展中国家的环境决策过程中并未得到很好的操作。本文以五个案例为例:柬埔寨,印度尼西亚,老挝,巴布亚新几内亚和越南,旨在确定新兴的治理安排是否通过提供参与性政策协调机制来帮助REDD +发展。本文基于有关环境治理和利益相关者参与的文献,研究了REDD +的国家治理结构,并确定了谁在哪里参与以及他们具有哪些决策权。尽管各国之间存在结构差异,但我们的分析表明,REDD +可能会鼓励一种新的环境治理形式,从而促进跨部门方法和利益相关者的参与。在更广泛的治理系统中,结构的凝聚力是定义REDD +治理能力的关键。结果还提出了一个问题,即所涉及的国家行为者的包容性如何应对森林的不同压力。考虑到结构性不平等,分析进一步表明需要对那些受到REDD +影响的人提供政策支持,以确保他们的声音可以在决策过程中听到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号