首页> 外文期刊>First Monday >Emoji at MOMA: Considering the original emoji as art
【24h】

Emoji at MOMA: Considering the original emoji as art

机译:MOMA上的表情符号:将原始表情符号视为艺术

获取原文
       

摘要

In 2016, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York announced that it had acquired forits permanent collection the original set of 176 emoji characters developed in 1999 byJapan’s telecommunication provider NTT DoCoMo.MoMA also organized an exhibition ofthe emoji in the museum’s lobby with the title “The Original Emoji, by Shigetaka Kurita,”thus highlighting its historical significance and the role of the designer.This paper exploresnew and critical yet under-discussed issues surrounding MoMA’s acquisition and exhibitionof the first emoji set.What happens when emoji enters an art museum? What can theMoMA’s accession and exhibition of emoji tell us about emoji, about art, and about therelationship between them? I will examine the discourses on the MoMA’s emoji accession,which reveal two positions against the emoji as art: a conservative view that emoji is notart and thus should not be in the museum and a revisionist effort to frame the emoji as adesign innovation rather than as art.But I draw attention to the MoMA’s exhibition of theemoji, which I analyze as a materialized display of the originally virtual characters.Usingtextual and aesthetic analyses together with theories of art, I argue the emoji at MoMA isart.
机译:2016年,纽约现代艺术博物馆(MoMA)宣布已永久性收藏了日本电信提供商NTT DoCoMo在1999年开发的176个表情符号原作.MoMA还在博物馆大厅组织了一次表情符号展览。标题为“原始的表情符号,由栗田茂孝”,从而突出了其历史意义和设计师的作用。本文探讨了MoMA购买和展示第一个表情符号集时所遇到的新的,关键的但尚未充分讨论的问题。美术博物馆? MoMA的表情符号展览和展示可以告诉我们有关表情符号,艺术以及它们之间的关系的信息吗?我将研究有关MoMA加入表情符号的论述,这些论述揭示了反对将表情符号视为艺术的两种立场:保守的观点认为表情符号不是艺术,因此不应出现在博物馆中;以及一种修正主义的努力,将表情符号视为一种设计创新,而不是作为设计创新。艺术,但是我提请注意MoMA的表情符号展览,我将其作为原始虚拟角色的物化展示进行分析。我通过对文本和美学的分析以及艺术理论,认为MoMA isart的表情符号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号