首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Recent American Library School Graduate Disciplinary Backgrounds are Predominantly English and History
【24h】

Recent American Library School Graduate Disciplinary Backgrounds are Predominantly English and History

机译:最近的美国图书馆学院毕业生的学科背景主要是英语和历史

获取原文
       

摘要

A Review of: Clarke, R. I., & Kim, Y.-I. (2018). The more things change, the more they stay the same: educational and disciplinary backgrounds of American librarians, 1950-2015. School of Information Studies: Faculty Scholarship , 178. https://surface.syr.edu/istpub/178 Objective – To determine the educational and disciplinary backgrounds of recent library school graduates and compare them to librarians of the past and to the general population. Design – Cross-sectional. Setting – 7 library schools in North America. Subjects – 3,191 students and their 4,380 associated degrees. Methods – Data was solicited from every ALA-accredited Master of Library Science (MLS) program in the United States of America, Canada, and Puerto Rico on students enrolled between 2012-2016 about their undergraduate and graduate degrees and areas of study. Data was coded and summarized quantitatively. Undergraduate degree data were recoded and compared to the undergraduate degree areas of study for the college-educated American population for 2012-2015 using the IPEDS Classification of Instructional Programs taxonomic scheme. Data were compared to previous studies investigating librarian disciplinary backgrounds. Main Results – 12% of schools provided data. Recent North American library school graduates have undergraduate and graduate degrees with disciplinary backgrounds in humanities (41%), social sciences (22%), professions (17%), Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) (11%), arts (6%), and miscellaneous/interdisciplinary (3%). Of the humanities, English (14.68%) and history (10.43%) predominate. Comparing undergraduate degrees with the college-educated American population using the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) classification schema, recent library school graduates have a higher percentage of degrees in social sciences and history (21.37% vs. 9.24%), English language and literature/letters (20.33% vs. 2.65%), computer and information science (6.54% vs. 2.96%), and foreign languages, literatures, and linguistics (6.25% vs. 1.1%). Compared to librarians in the past, there has been a decline in recent library school graduates with English language and literature/letters, education, biological and physical sciences, and library science undergraduate degrees. There has been an increase in visual and performing arts undergraduate degrees in recent library school graduates. Conclusion – English and history disciplinary backgrounds still predominate in recent library school graduates. This could pose problems for library school students unfamiliar with social science methodologies, both in school and later when doing evidence-based practice in the work place. The disciplinary backgrounds of recent library school graduates were very different from the college-educated American population. An increase in librarians with STEM backgrounds may help serve a need for STEM support and provide more diverse perspectives. More recent library school graduates have an arts disciplinary background than was seen in previous generations. The creativity and innovation skills that an arts background provides could be an important skill in librarianship.
机译:评论:Clarke,R. I.和Kim,Y.-I.。 (2018)。变化越多,它们保持不变的程度就越多:1950-2015年,美国图书馆员的教育背景和学科背景。信息学院:院系奖学金,178。https://surface.syr.edu/istpub/178目标–确定最近图书馆学校毕业生的教育和学科背景,并将其与过去的图书馆员和一般人群进行比较。设计–横截面。地点-北美有7所图书馆学校。科目– 3,191名学生及其4,380个相关学位。方法–从美国,加拿大和波多黎各的每个ALA认可的图书馆学硕士(MLS)计划中收集的数据均收集了2012-2016年之间就读的本科和研究生学位以及学习领域的学生。对数据进行编码和定量汇总。使用IPEDS教学计划分类法分类学,对本科学位数据进行了重新编码,并与2012-2015年受大学教育的美国人群的本科学位研究领域进行了比较。将数据与以前调查图书馆员学科背景的研究进行比较。主要结果– 12%的学校提供​​了数据。北美图书馆学校的最近毕业生拥有本科和研究生学位,具有人文学科(41%),社会科学(22%),专业(17%),科学,技术,工程与数学(STEM)(11%),艺术的学科背景(6%),以及杂项/跨学科(3%)。在人文学科中,英语(14.68%)和历史(10.43%)占主导地位。使用综合中学后教育数据系统(IPEDS)分类方案将本科学位与受过大学教育的美国人口进行比较,最近的图书馆学校毕业生在社会科学和历史方面的学位比例更高(分别为21.37%和9.24%),英语和文学/字母(20.33%vs. 2.65%),计算机和信息科学(6.54%vs. 2.96%),以及外语,文学和语言学(6.25%vs. 1.1%)。与过去的图书馆员相比,最近拥有英语语言和文学/字母,教育,生物和物理科学以及图书馆学专业学位的图书馆学校毕业生有所下降。最近图书馆学校毕业生的视觉和表演艺术本科学位有所增加。结论–在最近的图书馆学校毕业生中,英语和历史学科背景仍然占主导地位。对于不熟悉社会科学方法论的图书馆学校学生,无论是在学校还是后来在工作场所进行循证实践,都可能造成问题。最近图书馆学校毕业生的学科背景与受过大学教育的美国人口有很大不同。具有STEM背景的图书馆员的增加可能有助于满足对STEM支持的需求,并提供更多不同的观点。与前几代人相比,更多的图书馆学校毕业生具有艺术学科背景。艺术背景提供的创造力和创新能力可能是图书馆管理的一项重要技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号