首页> 外文期刊>Energies >EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China
【24h】

EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China

机译:不使用CCS的煤直接液化的EROI分析:以中国神华DCL项目为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Currently, there are considerable discrepancies between China’s central government and some local governments in attitudes towards coal to liquids (CTL) technology. Energy return on investment (EROI) analysis of CTL could provide new insights that may help solve this dilemma. Unfortunately, there has been little research on this topic; this paper therefore analyses the EROI of China’s Shenhua Group Direct Coal Liquefaction (DCL) project, currently the only DCL commercial project in the world. The inclusion or omission of internal energy and by-products is controversial. The results show that the EROIstnd without by-product and with internal energy is 0.68–0.81; the EROIstnd (the standard EROI) without by-product and without internal energy is 3.70–5.53; the EROIstnd with by-product and with internal energy is 0.76–0.90; the EROIstnd with by-product and without internal energy is 4.13–6.14. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a means to control the CO2 emissions. Considering the added energy inputs of CCS at the plant level, the EROIs decrease to 0.65–0.77, 2.87–3.97, 0.72–0.85, and 3.20–4.40, respectively. The extremely low, even negative, net energy, which may be due to high investments in infrastructure and low conversion efficiency, suggests CTL is not a good choice to replace conventional energy sources, and thus, Chinese government should be prudent when developing it.
机译:当前,中国中央政府与一些地方政府在对煤制油(CTL)技术的态度上存在很大差异。 CTL的能源投资回报(EROI)分析可以提供新的见解,可能有助于解决这一难题。不幸的是,关于这个主题的研究很少。因此,本文分析了神华集团直接煤液化(DCL)项目的EROI,该项目是目前世界上唯一的DCL商业项目。包含或省略内部能量和副产物是有争议的。结果表明,没有副产品和内部能量的EROI stnd 为0.68–0.81;没有副产物且没有内部能量的EROI stnd (标准EROI)为3.70-5.53;副产品和内部能量的EROI stnd 为0.76-0.90;带有副产物且没有内部能量的EROI stnd 为4.13–6.14。此外,有必要考虑碳捕集与封存(CCS)作为控制CO 2 排放的手段。考虑到工厂层面CCS的附加能源输入,EROI分别降至0.65-0.77、2.87-3.97、0.72-0.85和3.20-4.40。净能源极低,甚至为负,这可能是由于对基础设施的大量投资和较低的转换效率所致,这表明CTL不是替代常规能源的理想选择,因此,中国政府在开发这种能源时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号