首页> 外文期刊>Fauna Norvegica >Time-Efficiency of Sorting Chironomidae Surface-Floating Pupal Exuviae Samples from Urban Trout Streams in Northeast Minnesota, USA
【24h】

Time-Efficiency of Sorting Chironomidae Surface-Floating Pupal Exuviae Samples from Urban Trout Streams in Northeast Minnesota, USA

机译:从美国明尼苏达州东北部城市鳟鱼溪流中浮游科的表面浮游Ex虫样本进行时间效率分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Collections of Chironomidae surface-floating pupal exuviae (SFPE) provide an effective means of assessing water quality in streams. Although not widely used in the United States, the technique is not new and has been shown to be more cost-efficient than traditional dip-net sampling techniques in organically enriched stream in an urban landscape. The intent of this research was to document the efficiency of sorting SFPE samples relative to dip-net samples in trout streams with catchments varying in amount of urbanization and differences in impervious surface. Samples of both SFPE and dip-nets were collected from 17 sample sites located on 12 trout streams in Duluth, MN, USA. We quantified time needed to sort subsamples of 100 macroinvertebrates from dip-net samples, and less than or greater than 100 chironomid exuviae from SFPE samples. For larger samples of SFPE, the time required to subsample up to 300 exuviae was also recorded. The average time to sort subsamples of 100 specimens was 22.5 minutes for SFPE samples, compared to 32.7 minutes for 100 macroinvertebrates in dip-net samples. Average time to sort up to 300 exuviae was 37.7 minutes. These results indicate that sorting SFPE samples is more time-efficient than traditional dip-net techniques in trout streams with varying catchment characteristics. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1380. Published online: 17 October 2012.
机译:Chironomidae表面漂浮的ex虫(SFPE)的收集提供了一种评估溪流中水质的有效手段。尽管在美国尚未广泛使用,但该技术并不是新技术,并且在城市景观中有机富集流中已证明比传统的浸入网采样技术更具成本效益。这项研究的目的是证明鳟鱼流中SFPE样本相对于浸入网样本的分类效率,集水区的城市化程度和不透水面的差异各不相同。从美国明尼苏达州德卢斯的12条鳟鱼流中的17个采样点收集了SFPE和浸入网的样品。我们量化了从浸入网样品中筛选100个大型无脊椎动物子样品以及从SFPE样品中分离出小于或等于100个紫罗兰色虾的子样品所需的时间。对于较大的SFPE样品,还记录了对300个exuviae进行二次采样所需的时间。 SFPE样本对100个样本的子样本进行分类的平均时间为22.5分钟,而浸入网样本中100个大型无脊椎动物的平均时间为32.7分钟。整理300个葡萄球菌的平均时间为37.7分钟。这些结果表明,在具有不同集水特征的鳟鱼流中,对SFPE样本进行分类比传统的浸入网技术更省时。 doi:10.5324 / fn.v31i0.1380。在线发布:2012年10月17日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号