Reliability, factor analysis and internal consistency calculation of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in French and in English among Lebanese adolescents

摘要

Objectives Our goal is to validate and to verify the reliability of the French and English versions of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in Lebanese adolescents. Study design A cross-sectional study was implemented. Methods 104 Lebanese students aged between 14 and 19 years participated in the study. The English version of the questionnaire was distributed to English-speaking students and the French version was administered to French-speaking students. A scale (1 to 7 with 1 = very well understood and 7 = not at all) was used to identify the level of the students' understanding of each instruction, question and answer of the ISI. The scale's structural validity was assessed. The factor structure of ISI was evaluated by principal component analysis. The internal consistency of this scale was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha. To assess test–retest reliability the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Results The principal component analysis confirmed the presence of a two-component factor structure in the English version and a three-component factor structure in the French version with eigenvalues 1. The English version of the ISI had an excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90), while the French version had a good internal consistency (α = 0.70). The ICC presented an excellent agreement in the French version (ICC = 0.914, CI = 0.856–0.949) and a good agreement in the English one (ICC = 0.762, CI = 0.481–890). The Bland–Altman plots of the two versions of the ISI showed that the responses over two weeks' were comparable and very few outliers were detected. Conclusion The results of our analyses reveal that both English and French versions of the ISI scale have good internal consistency and are reproducible and reliable. Therefore, it can be used to assess the prevalence of insomnia in Lebanese adolescents. Highlights ? Principal component analysis found two factors in the English version and three in the French version of the ISI. ? The English version of the ISI showed an excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90). ? Almost a perfect agreement was obtained with the French version of ISI where ICC = 0.914 (CI = 0.856–0.949). ? The Bland–Altman plots of the two versions of ISI showed that the responses over two weeks’ time were comparable. ? Both English and French versions of the ISI are reproducible and reliable.