首页> 外文期刊>Family medicine >Association of Reproductive Health Training on Intention to Provide Services After Residency: The Family Physician Resident Survey
【24h】

Association of Reproductive Health Training on Intention to Provide Services After Residency: The Family Physician Resident Survey

机译:生殖健康培训协会关于在住院后提供服务的意愿:家庭医生住院医师调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: High rates of unintended pregnancy and need for reproductive health services (RHS), including abortion, require continued efforts to train medical professionals and increase availability of these services. With US approval 12 years ago of Mifepristone, a medication abortion pill, abortion services are additionally amenable to primary care. Family physicians are a logical group to focus on given that they provide the bulk of primary care.Methods: We analyzed data from an annual survey (2007–2010) of third-year family medicine residents (n=284, response rate=48%–64%) in programs offering abortion training to examine the association between such training and self-reported competence and intentions to provide RHS (with a particular focus on abortion) upon graduation from residency.Results: The majority of residents (75% in most cases) were trained in each of the RHS we asked about; relatively fewer trained in implant insertion (39%), electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) (58%), and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) (69%). Perceived competence on the part of the graduating residents ranged from high levels in pregnancy options counseling (89%) and IUD insertion (85%) to lows in ultrasound and EVA (both 34%). Bivariate analysis revealed significant associations between number of procedures performed and future intentions to provide them. The association between competence and intentions persisted for all procedures in multivariate analysis, adjusting for number of procedures. Further, the total number of abortions performed during residency increased the odds of intending to provide MVA and medication abortion by 3% and 2%, respectively.Conclusions: Findings support augmenting training in RHS for family medicine residents, given that almost half (45%) of those trained intended to provide abortions. The volume of training should be increased so more residents feel competent, particularly in light of the fact that combined exposure to different abortion procedures has a cumulative impact on intention to provide MVA and medication abortion.(Fam Med 2015;47(1):22-30.)The widespread need in the United States for reproductive health services has been clearlydocumented.1 Improved family planning services to better space pregnancies and decrease unintended pregnancies is one of the goals of Healthy People 2020.2 That approximately half of pregnancies each year are unintended, 43% of which end in abortion,3 attests to the importance of increased availability of reproductive-related services. Given that reproductive health services are among the most commonly performed in the United States (including abortion),4 numerous efforts have been undertaken to increase the number of health care providers offering these services.5,6 Over the past decade, a concerted effort to consider physicians other than obstetrician-gynecologists (ie, family physicians)7-11 and advanced practice clinicians (eg, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse-midwives)12-14 has been important for increasing providers of these services.Family physicians are an obvious group to consider since they provide the bulk of primary care in this country.15 The geographic location of family physicians mirrors the distribution of the population—77% practice in urban areas (where 79% of the population lives), and 22% practice in rural areas (where 21% of the population lives). Thus, integrating contraception and abortion into family medicine residency training has the potential of greatly expanding access to these services. There are 461 family medicine residency programs nationwide.16 In 2002, 11 of these provided abortion training as part of their core curriculum.17 Today, approximately 25 programs (5.4%) offer “opt-out” abortion training, meaning that residents will receive such training unless they explicitly elect not to (The Center for Reproductive Health Education in Family Medicine (http://rhedi.org/resources/programs.php). Other residen
机译:背景和目标:意外怀孕率很高,需要包括流产在内的生殖健康服务(RHS),需要继续努力培训医学专业人员并增加这些服务的可用性。在12年前美国批准使用米非司酮(一种药物流产药)后,流产服务还可以接受初级保健。方法:我们分析了一项针对家庭医学三年级居民的年度调查(2007年至2010年)(n = 284,缓解率= 48%),因​​此,家庭医生是一个需要关注的逻辑群体。 –64%)提供堕胎培训的计划,以检查此类培训与自我报告的能力之间的关联,以及打算从居住地毕业后提供RHS(特别侧重于堕胎)的意图。结果:大多数居民(大多数为75%)案例)在我们询问的每个RHS中进行了培训;相对较少的接受过植入物植入的培训(39%),电动真空抽吸(EVA)(58%)和手动真空抽吸(MVA)(69%)。即将毕业的居民的感知能力从高水平的妊娠选择咨询(89%)和宫内节育器插入(85%)到低超声和EVA(均为34%)不等。双变量分析揭示了执行的程序数量与将来提供这些程序的意图之间的显着关联。在多变量分析中,对于所有程序,能力和意图之间的联系一直存在,并根据程序数量进行了调整。此外,在住院期间进行的流产总数使打算提供MVA和药物流产的几率分别增加了3%和2%。结论:鉴于几乎一半(45%)的发现,研究结果支持对家庭医学居民进行RHS培训)接受过堕胎培训的人员。应增加培训数量,使更多的居民感到有能力,尤其是考虑到同时接受不同的流产程序会对提供MVA和药物流产的意图产生累积影响。(Fam Med 2015; 47(1):22 -30。)明确记录了美国对生殖健康服务的广泛需求。1改善计划生育服务以改善太空怀孕并减少意外怀孕是健康人的目标之一2020.2每年大约一半的意外怀孕,其中有43%的人以堕胎告终3,这证明了增加与生殖有关的服务的重要性。鉴于生殖健康服务是美国最常提供的服务(包括堕胎)4,因此已经做出了许多努力来增加提供这些服务的医疗保健提供者的数量。5,6。考虑除妇产科医生(即家庭医生)7-11和高级执业医师(例如护士,医生助理和合格的助产士)12-14以外的医生对于增加这些服务的提供者很重要。是一个显而易见的群体,因为他们在这个国家提供了大部分的初级保健。15家庭医生的地理位置反映了人口的分布情况,其中77%在城市地区(那里有79%的人口居住),而22 %在农村地区(人口的21%居住)执业。因此,将避孕和堕胎纳入家庭医学住院医师培训有可能极大地扩大获得这些服务的机会。全国有461个家庭医学住院医师培训计划。162002年,其中11个家庭医学住院医师培训计划是其核心课程的一部分。17如今,约有25个计划(5.4%)提供“选择退出”的人工流产培训,这意味着居民将获得除非他们明确选择不参加此类培训(家庭医学生殖健康教育中心(http://rhedi.org/resources/programs.php)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号