...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut and Liver >The Bleeding Risk after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents Is Not Negligible
【24h】

The Bleeding Risk after Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents Is Not Negligible

机译:服用抗血栓药的患者在内镜超声引导下细针穿刺后出血的风险不可忽略

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the established standard method for the histological diagnosis of various gastrointestinal malignancies and peri-intestinal structures. 1 Peri-intestinal structures include lymph nodes, masses in the pancreas, liver, adrenal gland, and bile duct that are accessible from the gastrointestinal tract. EUS-FNA is indispensable especially in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Moreover, as the procedure has evolved, it has become possible to perform various magic interventions by modifying EUS-FNA. Therefore, the applications of EUS including EUS-FNA are getting much more attention worldwide. The more often it is performed, the more attention is needed to its complications. Bleeding is one of the significant adverse events after EUS-FNA. The overall adverse event associated with EUS-FNA was reported to be 0.98% including a bleeding rate of 0.13% (14/10,941) according to a recent meta-analysis. 2 EUS-FNA is defined as a high-risk procedure in the guidelines of the European and American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 3 , 4 However, the basis of these guidelines is relatively weak since most relevant studies were retrospective, and there were few studies on the risk of bleeding in patients taking antithrombotic agents. Kawakubo et al ., 5 prospectively evaluated the bleeding risk of EUS-FNA in patients taking antithrombotic agents. This study is of great significance in that there have been few studies of this kind in the past and that it was a prospective multicenter study in Japan. In the study, bleeding after EUS-FNA occurred in two of 85 (2.4%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 8.3%) patients taking anti-thrombotic agents. One was receiving dual antiplatelet therapy and the other was taking warfarin. Both of them underwent bleeding in spite of discontinuation of thienopyridine and warfarin in advance, respectively. The authors concluded that the rate of bleeding after EUS-FNA in patients taking antithrombotic agents might be considerable. Although this study was conducted on a small number of patients with limited statistical power, which may well affect EUS-FNA practice in the future because there were few similar prospective studies in the past. A recent retrospective study on the similar subject reported that the overall bleeding rate was 0.9% (7/742). 6 In detail, 131 patients (17.7%) were on antithrombotic therapy in 742 patients and six of seven bleeding occurred in patients who did not take antithrombotic agents. Bleeding occurred in one patient (1.6%) among the 61 patients who maintained use of aspirin or cilostazol, and no bleeding was detected in 62 patients who had discontinued antithrombotic agents. Based on these results, the authors concluded that the bleeding rate was low even in patients who underwent EUS-FNA while continuing aspirin or cilostazol. However, this study was a retrospective study with a small number of patients. So, it is difficult to generalize the results. There has been a similar study in the past. Kien-Fong Vu et al ., 7 observed no bleeding events in 26 patients taking aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, while seven of 190 bleeding events (3.7%) occurred in control groups. Since the study also included a small number of patients and guidelines were not established at that time, it is also difficult to generalize at present. The American and European guidelines recommend that aspirin should not be discontinued prior to EUS-FNA regardless of thrombotic risk, but thienopyridine and anticoagulants should be discontinued before the procedure. 3 , 4 However, Kawakubo et al ., 5 reported that bleeding could occur even if antithromobitic agents were stopped in advance according to these guidelines. Though these drugs are stopped, the risk of bleeding does not seem to be lowered than expected. In summary, when EUS-FNA is performed in patients taking antithrombotic agents, thienopyridine and anticoagulants should be stopped in advance. Even if these drugs are stopped, care should be taken in consideration of the risk of bleeding during or after EUS-FNA.
机译:内窥镜超声引导下细针穿刺术(EUS-FNA)是各种胃肠道恶性肿瘤和肠周围结构的组织学诊断的既定标准方法。 1肠周围结构包括可从胃肠道进入的淋巴结,胰腺,肝脏,肾上腺和胆管肿块。 EUS-FNA是必不可少的,尤其是在胰腺恶性肿瘤的诊断中。此外,随着程序的发展,通过修改EUS-FNA可以执行各种魔术干预。因此,包括EUS-FNA在内的EUS的应用在世界范围内越来越受到关注。它执行得越频繁,就越需要注意其并发症。出血是EUS-FNA后的重大不良事件之一。根据最近的荟萃分析,与EUS-FNA相关的总体不良事件据报道为0.98%,包括0.13%的出血率(14 / 10,941)。 2 EUS-FNA在欧美胃肠道内窥镜学会指南中被定义为高风险手术。 [3,4]但是,由于大多数相关研究都是回顾性的,因此这些指导原则的基础相对薄弱,并且很少有关于服用抗血栓药的患者发生出血风险的研究。 Kawakubo等[5]前瞻性评估了服用抗血栓药的患者EUS-FNA的出血风险。这项研究具有重要意义,因为过去很少进行此类研究,并且在日本是一项前瞻性的多中心研究。在这项研究中,接受抗栓剂治疗的85名患者中有2名发生了EUS-FNA出血(2.4%; 95%CI,0.6%至8.3%)。一个正在接受双重抗血小板治疗,另一个正在服用华法林。尽管分别停用噻吩并吡啶和华法林,但它们都发生了出血。作者得出的结论是,服用抗血栓药的患者在EUS-FNA术后的出血率可能很高。尽管这项研究是针对少数统计能力有限的患者进行的,但由于过去很少有类似的前瞻性研究,因此很可能会影响EUS-FNA的未来实践。最近对类似受试者的回顾性研究报告,总出血率为0.9%(7/742)。 6详细地,在742例患者中有131例患者(17.7%)接受了抗栓治疗,并且七分之六的出血发生在未服用抗栓剂的患者中。维持使用阿司匹林或西洛他唑的61例患者中有1例(1.6%)出现出血,在62例停用抗血栓药的患者中未发现出血。基于这些结果,作者得出结论,即使在继续使用阿司匹林或西洛他唑同时接受EUS-FNA的患者中,出血率也很低。但是,该研究是一项针对少数患者的回顾性研究。因此,很难一概而论。过去也有类似的研究。 Kien-Fong Vu等[7]观察到26例服用阿司匹林或非甾体类抗炎药的患者没有出血事件,而对照组190例出血事件中有7例(3.7%)发生。由于该研究还包括了少数患者,并且当时还没有建立指南,因此目前也很难一概而论。美国和欧洲指南建议,无论血栓风险如何,均不应在EUS-FNA之前停用阿司匹林,但在手术前应停用噻吩并吡啶和抗凝剂。 [3,4]然而,Kawakubo等[5]报告说,即使根据这些指导原则预先停用抗血栓药物,也可能发生出血。尽管已停止使用这些药物,但出血风险似乎并未比预期的要低。总之,在服用抗血栓药的患者中进行EUS-FNA时,应事先停用噻吩并吡啶和抗凝剂。即使停止使用这些药物,也应注意在EUS-FNA期间或之后出血的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号