首页> 外文期刊>Global Journal of Surgery >Does Ambulatory Care Clinic Follow-up Improve the Acute Cholecystectomy Service at a DGH?
【24h】

Does Ambulatory Care Clinic Follow-up Improve the Acute Cholecystectomy Service at a DGH?

机译:DGH的非卧床门诊临床随访是否改善了急性胆囊切除术服务?

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Biliary disease is a common cause of admission to UK hospitals and NICE guidance recommends early cholecystectomy [1]. Evidence supporting early cholecystectomy is primarily from tertiary centres [2,3,4]. This study was undertaken in a District General Hospital to assess the acute cholecystectomy service. The primary aim was to assess the effects of ambulatory follow-up care clinics on reducing complications and readmissions. Methods: Data were collected for 2 groups: all patients having acute cholecystectomy on purpose built operation theatre lists during 6 month periods before, and after, the introduction of ambulatory follow-up clinics in 2013 and 2014. The methodology was kept identical to allow a fair comparison. The Nottingham CCG standards for Gallstone disease were used as gold standard. Results: There were 77 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed during the initial pre-ACC period. There was a reduction in the length of inpatient stay in the 30 day follow up compared with the acute cholecystectomies performed in emergency theatre from an earlier audit, however the data showed 15% re-admission and 1% re-operation in newly developed service. An ambulatory care clinic(ACC) was set up and data was re collected. In the post-ACC period 87 patients underwent acute laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Median length of stay was unchanged at 1 day (range 0-48). A small increase in the number of day case discharges from 42.8% to 48.3% was observed (p = 0.531). A decrease in all grades of complications was observed including 30 day re-admission. This was reduced from 15.6% to 8% (P<0.05). The reoperation rates were low and there was no mortality in either group. All these outcome measures met, or bettered, the standards from Nottingham CCG. Conclusions: The study showed that by introducing early and easily accessible ambulatory follow up, a reduction in re-admission rates can be achieved following acute cholecystectomy. There was no mortality during the study period, and a high day case rate with the demonstration that a safe service can be delivered in a DGH as compared to a tertiary center. We recommend that acute cholecystectomies with a provision for ambulatory follow up should be offered as a safe and effective practice.
机译:简介:胆道疾病是英国医院入院的常见原因,NICE指南建议尽早进行胆囊切除术[1]。支持早期胆囊切除术的证据主要来自第三中心[2,3,4]。这项研究是在地区综合医院进行的,以评估急性胆囊切除术的服务。主要目的是评估门诊随访诊所对减少并发症和再次入院的影响。方法:收集2组患者的数据:在2013年和2014年引入门诊随访诊所之前和之后的6个月期间,在特意建立的手术室清单上进行急性胆囊切除术的所有患者。公平的比较。诺丁汉胆囊疾病的CCG标准被用作黄金标准。结果:在最初的ACC前期进行了77例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。与早期审核中在急诊室进行的急性胆囊切除术相比,在30天的随访中住院时间缩短了,但是数据显示,在新开发的服务中,重新住院的比例为15%,再次手术的比例为1%。建立了一个门诊诊所(ACC)并收集了数据。在ACC后时期,有87例患者接受了急性腹腔镜胆囊切除术。中位停留时间在1天不变(范围0-48)。每天出院日数从42.8%略微增加到48.3%(p = 0.531)。观察到所有级别的并发症都有所减少,包括再次住院30天。这从15.6%降至8%(P <0.05)。再手术率低,两组均无死亡。所有这些结果指标均达到或改善了诺丁汉CCG的标准。结论:该研究表明,通过引入早期且容易获得的门诊随访,急性胆囊切除术后可降低再次入院率。在研究期间没有死亡率,而且日间病死率高,这说明与第三级中心相比,DGH可以提供安全的服务。我们建议,应提供急性胆囊切除术并进行动态随访,这是一种安全有效的做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号