首页> 外文学位 >A peer-review study of the quality of care provided by pharmaceutical care practitioners in an ambulatory care clinic setting.
【24h】

A peer-review study of the quality of care provided by pharmaceutical care practitioners in an ambulatory care clinic setting.

机译:对门诊医疗机构中的药物护理从业人员提供的护理质量的同行评审研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. The overall objectives were to: (1) determine the level of agreement among the peer reviewers with the clinical decisions made by the pharmaceutical care practitioners, (2) determine what factors might decrease the level of agreement, and (3) determine the level of quality of the patient care provided by the pharmaceutical care practitioners.; Methods. The quality of clinical decisions made by pharmacists within this collaborative practice of pharmaceutical care was studied using a nine member panel of physicians and pharmaceutical care pharmacists, and nine randomly selected pharmaceutical care patients. This was a quality assessment and care process validation component of a study evaluating the effects of collaborative pharmaceutical care in a population of Blue Cross/Blue Shield Blue Plus patients. A structured implicit review process was used to assess the clinical credibility of clinical decisions made by pharmaceutical care practitioners.; Results. The most common medical condition was “other nutritional needs” (26%), followed by hypertension (11%), and diabetes and osteoporosis accounting for six percent each. Out of the 5796 ratings, the reviewers expressed agreement with the pharmaceutical care practitioner's decision in 91.24% of the ratings, and expressed disagreement with the decision in only 2.16% of the ratings. In addition, 6 or more reviewers agreed with a specific clinical decision in 99.84% of the cases.; Conclusion. The results from this study show that there was a very high level of agreement with the clinical decisions made by the pharmaceutical care practitioners. Although the pharmaceutical care pharmacist reviewers were more likely to give a higher agree rating than the physician reviewers, the physicians still had a very high mean rating. These high ratings and the almost 100% level of clinically credible agreement (99.84%), gives evidence to the fact that the Fairview pharmaceutical care practitioners are providing a high level of quality patient care.
机译:目标。总体目标是:(1)根据药品护理从业人员的临床决策来确定同行评审员之间的共识水平;(2)确定哪些因素可能会降低共识水平;以及(3)确定药品护理从业人员提供的患者护理质量。 方法。使用9位医师和药物护理药剂师组成的小组以及9位随机选择的药物护理患者,研究了在这种药物护理协作实践中由药物师做出的临床决策的质量。这是一项研究的质量评估和护理过程验证组件,该研究评估了协作药物护理对Blue Cross / Blue Shield Blue Plus患者群体的影响。结构化的隐式审查程序用于评估药物护理从业人员做出的临床决策的临床可信度。 结果。最常见的医疗状况是“其他营养需求”(26%),其次是高血压(11%),糖尿病和骨质疏松症各占6%。在5796个评分中,审阅者对91.24%的评分表示同意药物治疗从业者的决定,而在2.16%的评分中表示不同意该决定。另外,有6名或以上的审稿人同意99.84%的病例做出特定的临床决定。 结论。这项研究的结果表明,与药物护理从业人员做出的临床决策高度吻合。尽管药学护理药剂师审稿人比医师审稿人更可能给出较高的同意评分,但医师的平均评分仍然很高。这些高评分和接近100%的临床可信协议水平(99.84%)证明了Fairview药物护理从业人员正在提供高质量的患者护理这一事实。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brown, Lawrence Marc.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Pharmacy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 167 p.
  • 总页数 167
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 药剂学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号