首页> 外文期刊>Global Media and China >Hegemonic media and inequality in Brazil:
【24h】

Hegemonic media and inequality in Brazil:

机译:巴西的霸权媒体和不平等现象:

获取原文
       

摘要

In Brazil, the traditional media crisis coincides with the historical moment of weakening political liberalism and the transit of the rational idea of the people in favor of a still obscure mass of population, redefined and fixed by the expanded market. There is a general perception that the forms of representation or framing of the social–political field, dating to the 18th and 19th centuries, cease to be operative in understanding and evaluating socially significant events. In the old place of argumentative rhetoric, the database files come in. The obliteration of the receptive pole in favor of the emission opens the way for the autonomization of the algorithm, that is, for the artificial intelligence to control the entire interlocutory process. On the other hand, the crisis of traditional forms does not imply the disappearance of journalism, which remains virtually a space, to be occupied in the recreation of new forms of mediation politically significant for civil society, even taking into account that the great constitutive principles Of modernity (social contract, democracy, citizenship, state, nation, individual identity) are no longer in tune with the social synthesis operated by the new socioeconomic order. Thus, journalism as a modern phenomenon can be redefined by the market and technology. And professional journalists is just one of several categories of actors mobilized to determine the facts and turn them into media event. In this context, a new, more segmented fact-finding power emerges, as well as a new kind of relationship between the public and the knowledge of reality. The so-called “social” networks are the most palpable example of this new state of affairs, fueling speculation about the modeling of this new type of journalism.
机译:在巴西,传统媒体危机恰逢政治自由主义减弱的历史时刻,以及人们对理性的观念的转变,而这种理性的观念支持仍然默默无闻的人口数量,并由扩大的市场重新定义。人们普遍认为,可以追溯到18世纪和19世纪的社会政治领域的代表形式或框架形式在理解和评估具有社会意义的事件时不再起作用。在争论激烈的言论的古老地方,数据库文件出现了。为了接受发射而消除了接收极,为算法的自动化(即人工智能控制整个对话过程)开辟了道路。另一方面,传统形式的危机并不意味着新闻业的消失,而新闻业的消失实际上仍然是一个空间,在重新发挥对民间社会具有政治意义的新形式的调解中将被占据,即使考虑到伟大的宪法原则现代性(社会契约,民主,公民身份,国家,国家,个人身份)已不再与新的社会经济秩序所运作的社会综合相协调。因此,新闻业是一种现代现象,可以通过市场和技术来重新定义。专业记者只是动员起来确定事实并将其转变为媒体事件的几类演员之一。在这种情况下,出现了一种新的,更细分的事实调查能力,以及公众与现实知识之间的新型关系。所谓的“社交”网络是这种新情况的最明显例子,这引发了人们对这种新型新闻业建模的猜测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号