首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Surgical Outcomes of Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Retrospective Study of Anterior Spinal Fusion and Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy
【24h】

Surgical Outcomes of Osteoporotic Vertebral Collapse: A Retrospective Study of Anterior Spinal Fusion and Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy

机译:骨质疏松椎骨塌陷的外科手术结果:前路脊柱融合和椎弓根减法截骨术的回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the surgical outcomes of anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC). Forty patients who underwent surgery for OVC at the thoracolumbar junction with neurological deficits were included in this study. ASF was primarily chosen for patients without vertebral compression fracture at other levels, and PSO was chosen for patients with more severe kyphosis or with multiple vertebral fractures. ASF was performed in 26 patients and PSO was performed in 14 patients. We evaluated the pre- and postoperative clinical status consisting of pain, gait, paralysis, and bladder function analysis. Additionally, pre- and postoperative kyphosis, correction angle, correction loss, and upright balance were investigated radiologically. Improvements in pain level, gait, paralysis, and bladder function were obtained in both groups. Average correction angles in the ASF and PSO groups were 16 and 37, respectively. Average correction losses at the final follow-up in the ASF and PSO groups were 7 and 13, respectively. Newly developed postsurgical vertebral compression fracture adjacent to the level of instrumentation was observed in four patients (15%) in the ASF group and in 11 patients (79%) from the PSO group. ASF provided satisfactory outcomes for patients with thoracolumbar OVC, who have no vertebral compression fracture at other levels. Although PSO has benefits for the correction of kyphosis, several problems persist with this procedure, especially for patients with severe osteoporosis. Keywords: osteoporotic vertebral collapse, anterior spinal fusion, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, surgical outcome, thoracolumbar junction Osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a significant injury producing a functional loss in activities of daily living for an increasing elderly population. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is conventionally treated conservatively with rest, immobilization, analgesics, brace therapy, and physical therapy. However, these compression fractures sometimes fail to heal, resulting in progressive collapse and/or pseudarthrosis. This situation has been defined as osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC). 1 2 Furthermore, OVC at the thoracolumbar junction often causes neurological deficits. Development of neurological deficits is typically associated with several factors, including direct neural compression from retropulsed bony fragments in the spinal canal, abnormal neural alignment subsequent to progressive kyphosis, and dynamic neural damage due to abnormal mobility at the fracture site. Decompression of the neural elements and restoration of spinal stability are essential in the surgical management for OVC. However, not only local factors but also general problems have to be considered when treating OVC. Patients with OVC have relatively severe osteoporosis and often possess multiple preexisting vertebral compression fractures, leading to technical difficulty in achieving spinal reconstruction. General spinal deformity is also a significant problem for these elderly patients such that local restoration of spinal alignment sometimes leads to adjacent spinal problems. 3 4 Surgical treatment for OVC is tailored for the individual patient presentation due to the multiple comorbidities in the osteoporetic population. We have selected two common surgical interventions for OVC at the thoracolumbar junction that have been in use since 1998: anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). The purpose of this retrospective study was to demonstrate surgical outcomes of these two separate procedures.
机译:这项回顾性研究的目的是证明骨质疏松性椎体塌陷(OVC)的前路脊柱融合术(ASF)和后减法截骨术(PSO)的手术效果。该研究包括四十名在胸腰交界处接受OVC手术并伴有神经功能缺损的患者。对于没有其他水平椎体压缩性骨折的患者,主要选择ASF;对于较严重的后凸畸形或多发性椎体骨折的患者,选择PSO。 26例患者进行了ASF,14例患者进行了PSO。我们评估了术前和术后的临床状况,包括疼痛,步态,瘫痪和膀胱功能分析。此外,放射学检查了手术前后驼背,矫正角度,矫正损失和直立平衡。两组的疼痛程度,步态,瘫痪和膀胱功能均得到改善。 ASF和PSO组的平均校正角分别为16和37。 ASF和PSO组在最终随访中的平均校正损失分别为7和13。在ASF组中有4名患者(15%)和在PSO组中有11名患者(79%)观察到了接近器械水平的新近发展的椎体压缩性骨折。 ASF为胸腰椎OVC的其他水平无椎体压缩性骨折的患者提供了令人满意的结果。尽管PSO对矫正后凸畸形有好处,但此过程仍然存在一些问题,特别是对于患有严重骨质疏松症的患者。关键词:骨质疏松性椎体塌陷,前路脊柱融合术,椎弓根减法截骨术,手术结局,胸腰交界骨质疏松性椎体骨折是严重的损伤,在老年人口中增加其日常生活活动能力。骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折通常采用休息,固定,止痛药,支撑疗法和物理疗法保守治疗。但是,这些压迫性骨折有时无法愈合,导致进行性塌陷和/或假关节。这种情况被定义为骨质疏松性椎体塌陷(OVC)。 1 2 此外,胸腰椎交界处的OVC通常会导致神经功能缺损。神经功能缺损的发展通常与多种因素有关,包括脊髓管内反冲的骨碎片对神经的直接压迫,进行性后凸畸形后的异常神经排列以及由于骨折部位活动性异常引起的动态神经损伤。在OVC的手术管理中,神经元减压和脊柱稳定性的恢复至关重要。但是,在治疗OVC时,不仅要考虑局部因素,还要考虑一般性问题。 OVC患者患有相对较严重的骨质疏松症,并且经常患有多个先前存在的椎骨压缩性骨折,导致实现脊柱重建的技术困难。对于这些老年患者,一般的脊柱畸形也是一个重要的问题,因此,脊柱排列的局部恢复有时会导致相邻的脊柱问题。 3 4 针对OVC的外科治疗是专门针对由于骨质疏松症人群中存在多种合并症,因此需要进行个别患者诊治。自1998年以来,我们已经选择了两种在胸腰椎交界处进行OVC的常用外科手术干预措施:前路脊柱融合术(ASF)和椎弓根减影截骨术(PSO)。这项回顾性研究的目的是证明这两种独立手术的手术效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号