...
首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >Association of experienced and evaluative well-being with health in nine countries with different income levels: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Association of experienced and evaluative well-being with health in nine countries with different income levels: a cross-sectional study

机译:在九个收入水平不同的国家中,经验丰富的健康评估与健康的关联:一项横断面研究

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundIt is important to know whether the relationships between experienced and evaluative well-being and health are consistent across countries with different income levels. This would allow to confirm whether the evidence found in high income countries is the same as in low- and middle-income countries and to suggest policy recommendations that are generalisable across countries. We assessed the association of well-being with health status; analysed the differential relationship that positive affect, negative affect, and evaluative well-being have with health status; and examined whether these relationships are similar across countries. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, interviews were conducted amongst 53,269 adults from nine countries in Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Evaluative well-being was measured with a short version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life instrument, and experienced well-being was measured with the Day Reconstruction Method. Decrements in health were assessed with the 12-item version of WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Block-wise linear regression and structural equation models were employed. ResultsConsidering the overall sample, evaluative well-being was more strongly associated with health (β?=??0.35) than experienced well-being (β?=??0.14), and negative affect was more strongly associated with health (β?=?0.10) than positive affect (β?=??0.02). The relationship between health and well-being was similar across countries. Lower scores in evaluative well-being and a higher age were the factors more strongly related with a worse health. ConclusionsThe different patterns observed across countries may be related to differences in the countries’ gross domestic product, social protection system, economic situation, health care provision, lifestyle behaviours, or living conditions. The fact that evaluative well-being is more predictive of health than experienced well-being suggests that our level of satisfaction with our lives might be more important for our health than the actual emotions than we experience in our day-to-day lives and points out the need of interventions that improve the way people evaluate their lives.
机译:背景知识重要的是要知道在收入水平不同的国家之间经验丰富的,评估的幸福感与健康之间的关系是否一致。这将有助于确认在高收入国家中发现的证据是否与在低收入和中等收入国家中发现的证据相同,并提出可以在各国之间推广的政策建议。我们评估了幸福感与健康状况之间的关系;分析正面影响,负面影响和评估幸福感与健康状况的差异关系;并检查了这些关系在各个国家之间是否相似。方法在本横断面研究中,对来自非洲,亚洲,欧洲和拉丁美洲9个国家的53269名成年人进行了访谈。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)生活质量工具的简短版本来评估评估性幸福感,并使用“日间重建法”来评估经历过的幸福感。使用12个项目的WHO残疾评估时间表2.0评估健康状况的下降。采用了分段线性回归和结构方程模型。结果就总体样本而言,评价性幸福感与健康的相关性(β?=?0.35)比经历的幸福感(β?=?0.14)更显着,负面影响与健康性(β?= (0.10)比正面影响(β= 0.02)。各国之间健康与福祉之间的关系相似。评估幸福感得分较低和年龄较高是与健康状况较差相关的因素。结论各国观察到的不同模式可能与该国的国内生产总值,社会保障体系,经济状况,医疗保健,生活方式,生活条件的差异有关。评估性幸福感比经历性幸福感更能预测健康,这一事实表明,与实际情感相比,我们对生活的满意程度比实际情感更重要,这比我们在日常生活和生活点中所经历的要重要。不再需要改善人们对生活的评估方式的干预措施。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号