首页> 外文期刊>Geography & Natural Disasters >Natural Hazard Resilient Communities and Land Use Planning: The Limitations of Planning Governance in Tropical Australia
【24h】

Natural Hazard Resilient Communities and Land Use Planning: The Limitations of Planning Governance in Tropical Australia

机译:自然灾害弹性社区和土地利用规划:热带澳大利亚规划治理的局限性

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper examines how two Australian land use planning systems address the creation of hazard resilient communities in tropical areas. The application of substantive hazard knowledge and how this influences the associated procedures within the planning system is examined. The case studies of Darwin the capital of the Northern Territory, and the beachside suburb of Machans Beach within the Cairns Regional Council in far north Queensland are investigated. Both case study locations have experienced tropical cyclones since settlement and despite their hazard prone locations, both have intensified over their 120 year existence. Moreover, it is predicted that cyclones in tropical Australia will decrease in number, but increase in intensity. It would be rational to assume that industry, community and government would actively pursue planning strategies to negate the risks of natural hazards and the corresponding level of vulnerability to a hazard event. However, neither communities nor planning are driven by rational technical decision making processes. The paper concludes that the rhetoric for creating hazard resilient communities dominates national and state government policy, however this has minimal influence upon the legal framework that protects development rights. It would appear that the safe development paradox is present in the Australian land use planning system, and that the focus of planning is on creating certainty of development rights and achieving efficiencies through urban settlement patterns, as opposed to creating hazard resilient communities.
机译:本文研究了两个澳大利亚的土地利用规划系统如何解决热带地区抗灾社区的创建。研究了实质性危害知识的应用以及这如何影响计划系统内的相关程序。调查了北领地首府达尔文以及昆士兰州北部的凯恩斯地区委员会内的海边Machans Beach郊区的案例。自定居以来,这两个案例研究地点都经历了热带气旋,尽管它们容易发生灾害,但都在其120年的生存中得到了加强。此外,据预测,热带澳大利亚的气旋数量会减少,但强度会增加。假设行业,社区和政府将积极采取计划策略来消除自然灾害的风险以及对灾害事件的脆弱性的相应水平,这是合理的。但是,社区和规划都不受合理的技术决策过程的驱动。本文得出的结论是,建立具有抗灾力的社区的言论在国家和州政府的政策中占主导地位,但这对保护发展权的法律框架影响最小。看来澳大利亚土地使用规划系统中存在安全发展悖论,规划的重点是建立发展权的确定性并通过城市居住模式实现效率,而不是建立具有抗灾力的社区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号