首页> 外文期刊>Geochronometria: journal on methods and applications of absolute chronology >Comparison of three K-feldspar luminescence dating methods for Holocene samples
【24h】

Comparison of three K-feldspar luminescence dating methods for Holocene samples

机译:全新世样品的三种钾长石发光测年方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The luminescence dating of the K-feldspar fraction is an alternative way for samples that cannot yield reasonable equivalent dose (De) from quartz fraction with very weak luminescence signal. For testing the reliability of the infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) dating of K-feldspar, luminescence dating was applied to quartz and K-feldspar fractions respectively for several Holocene samples in this study. K-feldspar apparent ages using routine single aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol, K-feldspar ages using g value correction method and ages from isochron dating method were compared with quartz ages. It is found that the g value correction method cannot give reliable ages due to the large errors induced during measurements. The isochron dating method is effective to the sample with problematically external dose rate. However, isochron dating may introduce a relatively greater error during grain sizes a?? De curve fitting, therefore this method could obtain low-resolution ages for Holocene samples. Even K-feldspar apparent age from routine SAR protocol is relatively younger by about 10% than the quartz age, it still could establish reasonable chronological framework for Holocene samples.
机译:钾长石级分的发光测年是无法从具有非常弱的发光信号的石英级分产生合理的等效剂量(De)的样品的另一种方法。为了测试钾长石的红外激发发光(IRSL)测年的可靠性,在这项研究中,将发光测年分别应用于几个全新世样品的石英和钾长石馏分。使用常规单等分再生剂量(SAR)方案的钾长石表观年龄,使用g值校正方法的钾长石年龄和等时测年法的年龄与石英年龄进行了比较。发现由于测量过程中引起的大误差,g值校正方法无法给出可靠的寿命。等时测年法对外部剂量率有问题的样品有效。但是,等时测年法可能会在晶粒尺寸α???期间引入相对较大的误差。根据曲线拟合,因此此方法可以获得全新世样品的低分辨率年龄。即使常规SAR协议中的钾长石表观年龄比石英年龄小约10%,它仍可以为全新世样品建立合理的年代学框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号