首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical transplantation >Comparison of Creatinine Clearance Estimates With Routine Measured Clearance in Adult Jordanians With a Kidney Transplant
【24h】

Comparison of Creatinine Clearance Estimates With Routine Measured Clearance in Adult Jordanians With a Kidney Transplant

机译:成年约旦人肾脏移植后肌酐清除率估计值与常规清除率的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: There are conflicting data on using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula to assess graft function in kidney transplants. This study uses a cohort of Jordanian kidney transplant patients to assess performance of the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations by using the criterion standard of measured creatinine clearance. Materials and Methods: Creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine creatinine in patients with a kidney transplant was compared with the estimated clearance using the Cockroft-Gault formula and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations. Correlation, limits of agreement, and concordance analyses were used. Results: There was a positive correlation between both the Cockcroft-Gault (r=0.878; P < .001) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (r=0.732; P < .001) equations with creatinine clearance. The former was statistically superior ( P = .0416). Using Bland-Altman plots, the limits of agreement were wide for both methods. After log transformation, the limits of agreement were -0.06 to +0.27 for the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and -0.21 to + 0.26 for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Concordance analyses showed a correlation coefficient of 0.7384 (95% CI: 0.6134 to 0.8273) when the Cockcroft-Gault formula was used, and 0.7257 (95% CI: 0.5622 to 0.8345) for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease. Pearson P coefficient (precision) and bias correction factor Cb (accuracy) for the Cockcroft-Gault formula and for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease were 0.8762, 0.8427, 0.7324, and 0.9908. Conclusions: In Jordanian patients with a renal transplant, although the Cockcroft-Gault formula performed slightly better than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in estimating creatinine clearance, neither of these equations can accurately predict renal graft function.
机译:目的:关于使用Cockroft-Gault公式和“改变肾脏疾病饮食”公式来评估肾移植的移植物功能存在矛盾的数据。这项研究使用约旦肾脏移植患者队列,通过使用肌酐清除率测定标准来评估Cockroft-Gault公式的性能和饮食中肾脏疾病方程的修改。材料和方法:将肾移植患者通过24小时尿肌酐测量的肌酐清除率与使用Cockroft-Gault公式和“饮食中肾脏疾病方程”的估计清除率进行比较。使用了相关性,一致性限制和一致性分析。结果:Cockcroft-Gault(r = 0.878; P <.001)与具有肌酐清除率的肾脏疾病饮食调整(r = 0.732; P <.001)方程之间呈正相关。前者在统计学上优于(P = .0416)。使用Bland-Altman图,两种方法的一致极限都很大。对数转换后,对于Cockcroft-Gault公式,一致性的限制为-0.06至+0.27,对于肾脏疾病的饮食调整,一致性的限制为-0.21至+ 0.26。一致性分析显示,当使用Cockcroft-Gault公式时,相关系数为0.7384(95%CI:0.6134至0.8273),而对于肾脏疾病饮食的修改,相关系数为0.7257(95%CI:0.5622至0.8345)。 Cockcroft-Gault公式和肾脏疾病饮食调整的Pearson P系数(精度)和偏差校正因子Cb(准确性)分别为0.8762、0.8427、0.7324和0.9908。结论:在约旦肾移植患者中,尽管Cockcroft-Gault公式在估算肌酐清除率方面比“饮食中的肾脏疾病”方程式稍好,但这些方程式均不能准确预测肾移植物的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号