...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Psychotraumatology >Untested assumptions: psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making
【24h】

Untested assumptions: psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making

机译:未经检验的假设:法律决策中的心理研究和信誉评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundTrauma survivors often have to negotiate legal systems such as refugee status determination or the criminal justice system.Methods & resultsWe outline and discuss the contribution which research on trauma and related psychological processes can make to two particular areas of law where complex and difficult legal decisions must be made: in claims for refugee and humanitarian protection, and in reporting and prosecuting sexual assault in the criminal justice system.ConclusionThere is a breadth of psychological knowledge that, if correctly applied, would limit the inappropriate reliance on assumptions and myth in legal decision-making in these settings. Specific recommendations are made for further study.
机译:背景创伤幸存者通常必须协商诸如难民身份确定或刑事司法系统之类的法律制度。方法与结果我们概述并讨论了对创伤及相关心理过程的研究可以对两个特殊的法律领域做出的贡献,在这些领域中,必须做出复杂而艰难的法律决定结论:有大量的心理学知识,如果正确运用,将会限制法律判决中对假设和神话的不恰当依赖,这些结论包括:在这些设置中进行。提出了具体建议以供进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号