首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Psychotraumatology >Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: a latent profile analysis
【24h】

Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: a latent profile analysis

机译:提议的ICD-11 PTSD和复杂PTSD的证据:潜在特征分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe WHO International Classification of Diseases, 11th version (ICD-11), has proposed two related diagnoses, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD within the spectrum of trauma and stress-related disorders.ObjectiveTo use latent profile analysis (LPA) to determine whether there are classes of individuals that are distinguishable according to the PTSD and complex PTSD symptom profiles and to identify potential differences in the type of stressor and severity of impairment associated with each profile.MethodAn LPA and related analyses were conducted on 302 individuals who had sought treatment for interpersonal traumas ranging from chronic trauma (e.g., childhood abuse) to single-incident events (e.g., exposure to 9/11 attacks).ResultsThe LPA revealed three classes of individuals: (1) a complex PTSD class defined by elevated PTSD symptoms as well as disturbances in three domains of self-organization: affective dysregulation, negative self-concept, and interpersonal problems; (2) a PTSD class defined by elevated PTSD symptoms but low scores on the three self-organization symptom domains; and (3) a low symptom class defined by low scores on all symptoms and problems. Chronic trauma was more strongly predictive of complex PTSD than PTSD and, conversely, single-event trauma was more strongly predictive of PTSD. In addition, complex PTSD was associated with greater impairment than PTSD. The LPA analysis was completed both with and without individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) yielding identical results, suggesting the stability of these classes regardless of BPD comorbidity.ConclusionPreliminary data support the proposed ICD-11 distinction between PTSD and complex PTSD and support the value of testing the clinical utility of this distinction in field trials. Replication of results is necessary.
机译:背景世卫组织《国际疾病分类》(第11版)(ICD-11)在创伤和压力相关疾病的范围内提出了两种相关的诊断方法,即创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD。确定是否存在根据PTSD和复杂PTSD症状特征区分的个体类别,并确定压力源类型和与每种特征相关的损伤严重程度的潜在差异。方法对302名患有LPA的个体进行了LPA和相关分析寻求针对人际创伤的治疗方法,从慢性创伤(例如,儿童期虐待)到单发事件(例如,暴露于9/11发作)。症状和自我组织三个方面的障碍:情感失调,负面自我概念和人际交往所有问题; (2)PTSD类别是由PTSD症状升高但在三个自组织症状域得分较低而定义的; (3)低症状类别,由所有症状和问题的低分定义。与PTSD相比,慢性创伤对PTSD的预测更为强烈,相反,单事件创伤对PTSD的预测更为强烈。此外,复杂的PTSD与PTSD的损害更大。 LPA分析在有或没有边缘性人格障碍(BPD)个体的情况下均完成,得出相同的结果,表明无论BPD合并症如何,这些类别的稳定性。在田间试验中测试这种区别的临床效用。复制结果是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号