首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis
【24h】

Comparative analysis between shape memory alloy-based correction and traditional correction technique in pedicle screws constructs for treating severe scoliosis

机译:椎弓根螺钉结构中基于形状记忆合金的矫正与传统矫正技术的比较分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The three-dimensional correction of severe rigid scoliosis has been improved by segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. However, there can be significant difficulty related to the use of a rigid rod, especially in the apex region of severe scoliosis. This study is a retrospective matched cohort study to evaluate the advantages of Nitinol shape memory alloy (SMA) rod-based correction by comparing the clinical and radiographic results obtained from using a temporary SMA rod and those from a standard rod in the correction of severe scoliosis. From May 2004 to September 2006, patients with matched curve type, ages at surgery, operative methods and fusion levels in our institute and instrumented with either SMA rods (n?=?14) or traditional correction techniques (n?=?16) were reviewed. In SMA group, the SMA rods served as a temporary intraoperative tool for deformity correction and were replaced by standard rods. The blood loss at surgery averaged 778?±?285?ml in the traditional group and 585?±?188?ml in the SMA group (P??0.05). Operative time averaged 284?±?53?min in the SMA group and 324?±?41?min in the traditional group (P??0.05). In the SMA group, the preoperative major curve was 92.6°?±?13.7° with a flexibility of 25.5?±?7.3% was corrected to 29.4°?±?5.7° demonstrating a 68.4% immediate postoperative correction. In the traditional group, the preoperative major curve was 88.6°?±?14.6° with a flexibility of 29.3?±?6.6% was corrected to 37.2°?±?7.3° demonstrating a 57.8% immediate postoperative correction. There was a statistic difference between the SMA group and traditional group in correction rate of the major thoracic curve. In the SMA group, one case suffered from deep infection 2?months postoperatively. In the traditional group, 6 of 16 cases suffered pedicle screw pull out or loosening during placement of the standard rod at the apex vertebrae on the concave side. In three cases, the mono-axial pedicle screws near the apex were abandoned and in five cases replaced with poly-axial pedicle screws. This study shows that the temporary use of SMA rod may reduce the operative time, blood loss, while improve the correction of the coronal plane when compared with standard techniques...
机译:通过节段椎弓根螺钉器械改善了严重的刚性脊柱侧弯的三维校正。但是,使用刚性杆可能会遇到很大的困难,特别是在严重脊柱侧弯的顶点区域。这项研究是一项回顾性配对研究,通过比较使用临时SMA棒和标准棒在严重脊柱侧凸矫正中获得的临床和放射学结果,评估了基于镍钛诺形状记忆合金(SMA)棒的矫正的优势。从2004年5月至2006年9月,在我院采用SMA棒(n = 14)或传统矫正技术(n = 16)进行曲线类型,手术年龄,手术方法和融合水平的匹配的患者为已审查。在SMA组中,SMA棒用作临时的术中矫正畸形的工具,并被标准棒替代。传统组的手术失血量平均为778?±?285?ml,SMA组的平均失血量为585?±?188?ml(P <0.05)。 SMA组平均手术时间为284±±53分钟,而传统组为324±±41分钟(P <0.05)。在SMA组中,术前主曲线为92.6°±±13.7°,柔韧性为25.5±±7.3%,矫正为29.4°±±5.7°,表明术后立即矫正为68.4%。在传统组中,术前主曲线为88.6°±±14.6°,柔韧性为29.3±±6.6%,矫正为37.2°±±7.3°,表明术后立即矫正为57.8%。 SMA组与传统组在主要胸廓曲线的矫正率上有统计学差异。 SMA组术后2个月有1例发生深度感染。在传统组中,16例中有6例在将标准杆放置在凹侧的顶点椎骨期间遭受椎弓根螺钉拉出或松动。在三例中,放弃了根尖附近的单轴椎弓根螺钉,在五例中被多轴椎弓根螺钉取代。这项研究表明,与标准技术相比,临时使用SMA棒可以减少手术时间,减少失血,同时改善冠状面的矫正...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号