首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2–3 fusion patients?
【24h】

Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2–3 fusion patients?

机译:椎弓根螺钉与椎弓根螺钉:在先天性C2-3融合患者中,什么能提供更合适的C2固定?

获取原文
       

摘要

Patients with Klippel–Feil syndrome (KFS) have congenital fusions of at least 1 cervical motion segment, and often present with compensatory hypermobility or symptomatic stenosis of the cranio-vertebral junction which requires occipitocervical reconstruction and fusion. One subgroup of KFS patients in which this is particularly common is those with isolated C2–3 congenital fusion (C2–3 CF). The anatomic suitability for C2 pedicle and laminar screw placement had been analyzed in the general adult population, and guidelines for their techniques had been established. However, the feasibility and safety of the two techniques in KFS patients with congenital C2–3 fusion has not been reported. This radiographic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of these two widely used methods in such patients. We recruited 108 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and reconstructed CTs were performed. Among them, 53 had C2–C3 congenital fusion diagnosed as KFS and 55 had normal cervical segmentation (NCS). The maximum possible diameters and length were measured along the ideal screw trajectories. Both of mean diameters and lengths of the C2 laminar screw trajectory in the C2–3 CF group were significantly larger than that in NCS. Mean diameters of the C2 pedicle screw trajectory in this group were significantly smaller than that in NCS group, however, C2–3 CF patients had longer pedicle paths than NCS. In the C2–3 CF group, all 53 cases had suitable trajectory for C2 laminar screw, while 21 (39.6%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5?mm. In the NCS group, 5 cases (9.1%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5?mm. All 108 cases had sufficient diameters for C2 laminar screw placement. Klippel–Feil patients with C2–3 CF are good candidates for the technique of C2 laminar screw. Preoperative radiography should be carefully evaluated and the option of C2 fixation be determined with a thorough consideration in these patients...
机译:患有Klippel-Feil综合征(KFS)的患者具有至少1个颈椎运动节段的先天性融合,并且常表现为代偿性高机动性或颅椎连接的症状性狭窄,需要枕颈重建和融合。其中尤为常见的KFS患者亚组是那些单独的C2-3先天性融合(C2-3 CF)的患者。在普通成年人中已经分析了C2椎弓根和椎板螺钉放置的解剖学适应性,并为其技术建立了指南。但是,尚未报道这两种技术在先天性C2-3融合的KFS患者中的可行性和安全性。进行此项放射学研究以评估这两种广泛使用的方法在此类患者中的可行性。我们招募了108例寰枢椎脱位患者,并进行了CT重建。其中,53例被诊断为KFS的C2-C3先天性融合,55例具有正常的宫颈分割(NCS)。沿理想的螺杆轨迹测量了最大可能的直径和长度。 C2–3 CF组的C2椎板螺钉轨迹的平均直径和长度均显着大于NCS。该组的C2椎弓根螺钉轨迹的平均直径显着小于NCS组,但是C2-3 CF患者的椎弓根路径比NCS长。在C2–3 CF组中,所有53例均具有适合C2椎板螺钉的轨迹,而21例(39.6%)的椎弓根直径小于4.5?mm。在NCS组中,有5例(9.1%)的椎弓根直径小于4.5?mm。所有108例均具有足够的直径用于C2椎板螺钉放置。具有C2–3 CF的Klippel–Feil患者是C2椎板螺钉技术的良好候选人。对于这些患者,应仔细评估术前放射线照相,并仔细考虑C2固定的选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European spine journal》 |2010年第8期|共6页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 10:26:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号