...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck
【24h】

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck

机译:跨文化适应性意大利语版本的颈部核心结局指标(COMI)的可靠性,效度和响应度

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeEvaluation of the psychometric properties of a cross-culturally adapted questionnaire, the Core Outcome Measurement Index for neck pain (COMI-neck).MethodsThe COMI-neck was cross-culturally adapted for the Italian language using established procedures. The following psychometric properties of the instrument were then assessed in patients with chronic neck pain undergoing rehabilitation: test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC); construct validity by comparing COMI-neck with the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, a numerical pain rating scale, and the EuroQol-Five Dimension (Pearson’s correlations); and responsiveness by means of Standardized Response Mean (SRM), unpaired t tests, and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 103 subjects. The COMI-neck summary score displayed no relevant floor or ceiling effects. Test–retest reliability was excellent (ICC?=?0.87). With one exception (symptom-specific well-being), the individual COMI items and the COMI summary score correlated to the expected extent with the scores of the reference questionnaires (r?=?0.40–0.80). The mean change scores for the Italian COMI-neck differed significantly between patients with a good global outcome and those with a poor outcome (p?=?0.002); SRM for the good outcome group was 1.23, and for the poor outcome group 0.40. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.73 (95?% CI: 0.62–0.85).ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that the Italian version of the COMI-neck is a valid and responsive questionnaire in the population of patients examined. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes...
机译:目的评估跨文化适应性问卷的心理计量学特性,即颈部疼痛的核心结果测量指数(COMI-neck)。方法采用既定程序对COMI颈部进行跨文化适应于意大利语言。然后,对接受康复治疗的慢性颈部疼痛患者评估了以下仪器的心理测量特性:重测信度(类内相关系数,ICC);通过将COMI颈部与颈部疼痛和残疾量表,数字疼痛等级量表以及EuroQol-5维度(皮尔逊相关性)进行比较,来构建有效性。通过标准化反应平均数(SRM),不成对t检验和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行反应和反应。结果该问卷由103位受试者完成。 COMI颈部摘要分数未显示相关的地板或天花板效果。重测的可靠性极好(ICC = 0.87)。除一个例外(症状特定的幸福感)外,各个COMI项目和COMI汇总得分与参考调查问卷的得分与预期程度相关(r = 0.40–0.80)。总体预后良好的患者和预后较差的患者,意大利COMI颈部的平均变化评分差异显着(p = 0.002)。结果良好组的SRM为1.23,结果较差组的SRM为0.40。 ROC分析显示曲线下的面积为0.73(95%CI:0.62-0.85)。结论这项研究提供了证据,即意大利版的COMI颈部在被检查的患者人群中是有效且反应迅速的问卷。建议将其用于临床和研究目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号