...
首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy
【24h】

Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

机译:多级颈椎病脊髓前路减压后不同重建技术并发症的比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeAnterior approach was extensively used in surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Following anterior decompression, many different reconstructive techniques (multilevel ACDF, hybrid construct and long corpectomy) all had satisfied outcomes. However, there are few studies focusing on the comparison of these three reconstructed techniques. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the complications of these three different methods.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed the complications in 286 consecutive patients with multilevel CSM who underwent anterior cervical surgery from 2005 to 2010. This case series had 166 men and 120 women whose mean age at surgery was 53.8?years (range from 33 to 74?years). Radiographic evaluation was taken the day after surgery, and the flexion–extension X-rays were added 3, 12 and 24?months postoperatively to evaluate the fusion condition. Preoperative versus postoperative neurologic function and clinical outcome were evaluated using scoring systems such as the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA score), Neck Disability Index (NDI score) and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 score).ResultsThere were no significant differences in JOA scores, NDI scores and SF-36 scores of the pairwise comparison among the three groups. The complications in our series included graft migration, collapse or displacement, hoarseness, dysphagia, C5 palsy, cerebral fluid leakage and wound infection. Sixty-one patients developed complications after surgery and the rate of complication was 21.33?%. Patients in the long corpectomy group had the highest rate of complications; the other two groups had a much lower rate of complications by the latest follow-up. The patients in the multilevel ACDF group had the highest fusion rate by the last follow-up. Patients who had C2–3 and C3–4 segments involved had a higher rate of postoperative hoarseness and dysphagia.ConclusionsMost of the complications of the three reconstructive techniques subsided gradually after conservative treatment; none of them needed revision surgery. The multilevel ACDF approach has the lowest rate of non-union, but a slightly higher morbidity of the laryngeal nerve-related complication if proximal segments were involved. The long corpectomy approach should be selected prudently because of the high rate of complication...
机译:目的前路手术广泛用于多层次颈椎病脊髓病的手术治疗。前路减压后,许多不同的重建技术(多层ACDF,混合结构和长体切除术)均取得了满意的疗效。但是,很少有研究关注这三种重构技术的比较。这项回顾性研究的目的是分析这三种不同方法的并发症。方法该研究回顾性回顾了2005年至2010年连续进行的286例多级CSM患者的颈椎前路手术。该病例系列共166例男性和120例女性手术的平均年龄为53.8岁(33至74岁)。术后第二天进行影像学评估,并在术后3、12和24个月添加屈伸X线片以评估融合情况。使用日本骨科协会(JOA评分),颈部残疾指数(NDI评分)和36项简短健康状况调查(SF-36评分)等评分系统评估术前与术后神经功能和临床结局。三组之间的成对比较,JOA得分,NDI得分和SF-36得分存在显着差异。我们的系列并发症包括移植物迁移,塌陷或移位,声音嘶哑,吞咽困难,C5麻痹,脑液漏出和伤口感染。手术后发生并发症61例,并发症发生率为21.33%。长体切除术组的并发症发生率最高。根据最新的随访结果,其他两组的并发症发生率要低得多。在最后一次随访中,多级ACDF组的患者融合率最高。涉及C2–3和C3–4节段的患者术后声音嘶哑和吞咽困难的发生率较高。结论保守治疗后,三种重建技术的大多数并发症逐渐消失。他们都不需要翻修手术。多级ACDF手术的不愈合率最低,但如果累及近端节段,则喉神经相关并发症的发病率略高。由于并发症的高发生率,应谨慎选择长体切除术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号