首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Physics Education >Assessment of Predictive Power of The Felder & Silverman Learning Styles Model on Students’ Performance in an Introductory Physics Course
【24h】

Assessment of Predictive Power of The Felder & Silverman Learning Styles Model on Students’ Performance in an Introductory Physics Course

机译:Felder&Silverman学习风格模型对物理入门课程中学生成绩的预测能力评估

获取原文
       

摘要

According to the Felder and Silverman Learning Styles Model (FSM), students have learning preferences regarding how information is obtained, processed, perceived and understood. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) is an online questionnaire created by Felder and Soloman to classify students according to their learning styles. With a priori knowledge of students' learning styles, one might hypothesize that the instructor could adapt his/her class to support, and even improve, students’ learning. Still, one question that remains open is whether it is possible to individualize the FSM, i.e., if students of determined learning styles perform different (better or worse) on questions mapped to different styles. In this work, we assessed the correlation between students' performance and their learning styles in an Introductory Physics course. We designed a Learning Styles Classification Method (LSCM) and implemented it online (LSQuiz) to predict individual students’ performance on pre-class questionnaires (N = 63). We found that, in general, the ability of the ILS to predict individual student performance on pre-class questionnaires was not better than random, with no significant correlation between students' performance and their learning styles, indicated by a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.54. Nevertheless, when independently analyzing the learning styles dimensions, we have identified heterogeneous data between the dimensions, with a greater correlation in the Sequential-Global dimension, with a 0.76 coefficient, followed by a coefficient of 0.50 in the Visual-Verbal and 0.35 in the Sensory-Intuitive. We found, however, that the results related to the Sequential-Global dimension are not supported by the internal consistency of that dimension in the ILS (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.30). We conclude suggesting that the adoption of customized learning practices in the Visual-Verbal dimension have potential and could be the focus of further studies.
机译:根据Felder和Silverman学习风格模型(FSM),学生对于如何获取,处理,感知和理解信息有学习偏好。学习风格指数(ILS)是Felder和Soloman创建的在线调查表,用于根据学生的学习风格对其进行分类。具备对学生学习风格的先验知识后,人们可能会认为讲师可以调整其班级以支持甚至改善学生的学习。仍然存在的一个问题是,是否有可能对FSM进行个性化设置,即,确定学习风格的学生对映射到不同风格的问题是否表现出不同(更好或更差)的看法。在这项工作中,我们评估了物理入门课程中学生的表现与学习风格之间的相关性。我们设计了一种学习风格分类方法(LSCM),并在线实施了该方法(LSQuiz),以预测每个学生在课前问卷调查中的表现(N = 63)。我们发现,总的来说,ILS能够通过课前调查问卷预测单个学生的表现的能力要好于随机的,在学生的表现和学习风格之间没有显着的相关性,皮尔森相关系数为0.54。但是,当独立分析学习风格的维度时,我们发现维度之间的异类数据在顺序全局维度中具有更大的相关性,系数为0.76,在视觉语言中的系数为0.50,在语言语言中的系数为0.35。感官直觉。但是,我们发现,ILS中该维度的内部一致性(Cronbach的alpha为0.30)不支持与顺序全局维度有关的结果。我们得出结论,认为在视觉-言语维度上采用定制的学习实践具有潜力,并且可能成为进一步研究的重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号