首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry and Medicine >European Journal of Dentistry and Medicine
【24h】

European Journal of Dentistry and Medicine

机译:欧洲牙医学杂志

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The bond strength of adhesives to dentin have been shown to be affected by a number of different factors, including intrinsic properties of the prepared dentin, various types of contamination and the chemical composition of the adhesive agent. The present study investigates the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of two different bonding systems at different dentinal areas of primary dentin after saliva contamination. Caries-free primary molars were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) for μTBS. Prime and Bond NT (etch-and-rinse) and Clearfil Protect Bond (two step self-etch) adhesives were tested under the following conditions: (a) control, (b) contamination with saliva prior to adhesive application. Following adhesive and composite superstructure application μTBS was measured. Maximum load at failure (N) was recorded and converted to MPa. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA with Tukey?s test. No statistically significant difference was found between the μTBS of the contaminated and control groups in the central region of primary dentin for either adhesive system tested (p>0.05). However, saliva contamination resulted in significant reductions in bond strength in the peripheral region (p<0.05) for both adhesive systems tested. In the saliva contaminated groups, μTBS was higher in the central region than in the peripheral region. The etch and rinse adhesive performed better than the two-step self-etching adhesive under saliva contamination in both the peripheral and central regions of primary dentin. Results indicate that saliva contamination should be avoided when restoring primary teeth with proximal cavities using both Prime and Bond NT (etch and rinse) and Clearfil Protect Bond (two step self-etch) adhesives. However, confirmatory studies are needed before conclusive recommendations can be made for clinical practice.
机译:已经显示出粘合剂与牙本质的粘合强度受许多不同因素的影响,这些因素包括所制备的牙本质的固有性质,各种类型的污染和粘合剂的化学组成。本研究调查了唾液污染后,两种不同粘合系统在原发性牙本质的不同牙本质区域的微拉伸粘合强度(μTBS)。对于μTBS,无龋齿的第一磨牙被随机分为四组(n = 10)。在以下条件下测试了Prime和Bond NT(蚀刻和冲洗)和Clearfil Protect Bond(两步自蚀刻)粘合剂:(a)对照,(b)在施加粘合剂之前被唾液污染。在施加粘合剂和复合物上部结构之后,测量了μTBS。记录最大失效载荷(N)并转换为MPa。使用单向方差分析与Tukey检验进行统计分析。对于两种测试的胶粘剂系统,在初级牙本质中央区域的污染组和对照组的μTBS之间均未发现统计学上的显着差异(p> 0.05)。然而,唾液污染导致两种测试的胶粘剂体系在周边区域的粘合强度显着降低(p <0.05)。在唾液污染组中,中心区域的μTBS高于周围区域的μTBS。在初级牙本质的周围和中央区域唾液污染的情况下,蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂的性能均优于两步自蚀刻粘合剂。结果表明,使用Prime和Bond NT(蚀刻和冲洗)和Clearfil Protect Bond(两步自蚀刻)粘合剂修复具有近端腔的乳牙时,应避免唾液污染。但是,在对临床实践提出最终建议之前,需要进行验证性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号