首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Do the New Hydrophilic Surface Have Any Influence on Early Success Rate and Implant Stability during Osseointegration Period? Four-Month Preliminary Results from a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Do the New Hydrophilic Surface Have Any Influence on Early Success Rate and Implant Stability during Osseointegration Period? Four-Month Preliminary Results from a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:新的亲水表面对骨整合期间的早期成功率和植入物稳定性有影响吗?口对开,随机对照试验的四个月初步结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The objective of this study is to compare the implant stability of Hiossen ET III implants with its new hydrophilic (NH) surface and Hiossen ET III implants with the sandblasted and acid-etched (SA) surface. Materials and Methods Patients required at least two teeth to be rehabilitated with a fixed, implant-supported restoration, consecutively enrolled. Patients randomly received SA surface implants (SA group) or SA implants with a newly developed bioabsorbable apatite nanocoating (NH group). Outcome measures were implant and prosthetic survival rate, complications, insertion torque, and implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at implant placement and every week up to 8 weeks after implant placement. Comparison between groups was made by unpaired t-test, while the comparison between each follow-up will be made by paired t-tests to detect any change during the follow-up. Complications and failures were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 14 patients were treated with 28 implants (14 SA and 14 NH). No implant and prosthesis failed 4 months after implant placement. No complications were experienced. At the 2nd week after implants placement, two implants in the SA group showed discontinuous measurements versus none in the NH group (p = 0.4815). Implants unscrewed during ISQ measurements and were rescrewed. Data recording stopped for 6 weeks. Both implants osseointegrated without any further complication. The NH implants did not show physiological ISQ decrease between 2nd and 4th week after implant placement, showing a more even pattern of ISQ values compared with SA implants (77.1 ± 4.6 vs. 72.9 ± 11.5; difference: 4.2 ± 12.1; p = 0.258). High ISQ values were found in both groups at each time point. Conclusions NH implants are a viable alternative to SA surface, as they seem to avoid the ISQ drop during the remodeling phase.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较具有新亲水性(NH)表面的Hiossen ET III植入物和具有喷砂和酸蚀(SA)表面的Hiossen ET III植入物。材料和方法患者需要至少两颗牙齿,并需要接受固定的,植入物支持的修复物进行修复。患者随机接受SA表面植入物(SA组)或具有新开发的可生物吸收的磷灰石纳米涂层的SA植入物(NH组)。结果是在植入物植入后以及植入后8周内每周进行植入物和假体存活率,并发症,插入扭矩和植入物稳定性商(ISQ)的测量。各组之间的比较通过不成对的t检验进行,而每次随访之间的比较将通过成对的t检验进行,以检测随访期间的任何变化。使用Fisher精确检验比较并发症和失败率。结果总共14例患者接受了28种植入物的治疗(14 SA和14 NH)。植入物放置4个月后,没有植入物和假体失败。没有并发症发生。在植入物放置后的第二周,SA组中的两个植入物显示出不连续的测量值,而NH组中则没有显示(p = 0.4815)。在ISQ测量期间拧松植入物,然后重新拧紧。数据记录停止了6周。两种植入物骨整合在一起,没有任何进一步的并发症。 NH植入物在植入后第2至第4周未显示生理学ISQ下降,与SA植入物相比,ISQ值显示出更均匀的模式(77.1±4.6对72.9±11.5;差异:4.2±12.1; p = 0.258) 。在每个时间点两组中都发现较高的ISQ值。结论NH植入物可以替代SA表面,因为它们似乎可以避免在重塑阶段ISQ下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号