首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Microtensile and Microshear Bond Strength of an Antibacterial Self-Etching System to Primary Tooth Dentin
【24h】

Microtensile and Microshear Bond Strength of an Antibacterial Self-Etching System to Primary Tooth Dentin

机译:抗菌自腐蚀系统对乳牙牙本质的微拉伸和微剪切粘结强度

获取原文
       

摘要

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the bonding ability of antibacterial bonding system to primary dentin was not different from the parental material which did not contain any antibacterial component.MethodsExtracted human non-carious primary molars were ground to expose the coronal dentin, and then randomly divided into two experimental groups: treatment with Clearfil Protect Bond or with Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc.). Composite-dentin sticks with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.90 mm2 were prepared and subsequently subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and microshear bond strength (μSBS) tests. For the μTBS tests, specimens were attached to an Instron testing machine with a cyanoacrylate adhesive. For μSBS testing, the sticks were mechanically fixed to the μSBS testing apparatus. The bonds were stressed in shear or tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until failure occurred. Resin-dentin interfaces produced by each system were examined using SEM. The data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney’s U test.ResultsThe μTBS and μSBS of Clearfil Protect Bond were 30.69±9.71 and 9.94±3.78 MPa, respectively. Clearfil SE Bond showed significantly greater values of 37.31±9.57 and 12.83±3.15 MPa, respectively. SEM analysis demonstrated similar micro-morphological features including the thickness of the hybrid layer for both materials.ConclusionsIt was showed that antibacterial self-etching system Clearfil Protect Bond showed lower bond strength values compared to primary dentin than that of to Clearfil SE Bond on primary dentin. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:11–17)
机译:目的本研究的目的是检验以下假设:抗菌键系统与初级牙本质的粘合能力与不含任何抗菌成分的母体材料没有什么不同。方法将提取的人类非龋性第一磨牙磨碎以暴露冠状牙本质,然后随机分为两个实验组:用Clearfil Protect Bond或Clearfil SE Bond(Kuraray Medical Inc.)治疗。制备横截面积约为0.90 mm2的复合牙本质棒,然后进行微拉伸粘合强度(μTBS)和微剪切粘合强度(μSBS)测试。对于μTBS测试,将样品用氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂连接到Instron测试机上。对于μSBS测试,将试棒机械固定到μSBS测试设备上。以1mm / min的十字头速度对粘结物施加剪切或拉伸应力,直到发生破坏。使用SEM检查每个系统产生的树脂-牙本质界面。结果通过Clearfil Protect Bond的μTBS和μSBS分别为30.69±9.71和9.94±3.78 MPa。 Clearfil SE Bond表现出明显更高的值,分别为37.31±9.57和12.83±3.15 MPa。扫描电镜分析显示两种材料具有相似的微观形貌特征,包括杂化层的厚度。结论表明,与主牙本质相比,抗菌自蚀刻系统Clearfil Protect Bond的粘结强度值低于Clearden SE Bond的粘结强度值。 (Eur J Dent 2008; 2:11–17)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号