首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Niti, M-Wire and CM-Wire instruments: A scanning electron microscopy analysis
【24h】

Residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Niti, M-Wire and CM-Wire instruments: A scanning electron microscopy analysis

机译:使用Niti,M-Wire和CM-Wire器械进行根管器械植入后的残留涂片层:扫描电子显微镜分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of residual smear layer after root canal instrumentation by using Ni-Ti, M-Wire, and CM-Wire instruments. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two mandibular incisors were randomly divided into six groups according to the system used: WaveOne (WO), Reciproc (RP), Unicone (UC), ProTaper Next (PN), Mtwo (MT), and HyFlex (HF). Afterward, the specimens were cleaved in the mesiodistal and buccolingual direction for analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Results: Considering both directions and root canal thirds, there was no difference between HF, MT, and PN. RP, UC, and WO presented a significant difference between the directions, and the cervical third showed a significantly smaller quantity of residual smear layer compared with the apical third. When the systems were compared among them, there was a significant difference only between RP and WO. Conclusions: Residual smear layer observed after instrumentation with the different systems was similar, except for quantities between the reciprocating systems.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较使用镍钛(Ni-Ti),M-Wire和CM-Wire器械根管手术后残留涂片层的数量。材料和方法:根据所使用的系统将72个下颌切牙随机分为六组:WaveOne(WO),Reciproc(RP),Unicone(UC),ProTaper Next(PN),Mtwo(MT)和HyFlex( HF)。之后,将标本沿近中颊和颊舌方向劈开,通过扫描电子显微镜进行分析。结果:考虑到方向和根管的三分之二,HF,MT和PN之间没有差异。 RP,UC和WO在方向之间存在显着差异,而第三颈椎的残留涂片层数量要比第三颈椎少得多。当比较其中的系统时,仅RP和WO之间存在显着差异。结论:在仪器上使用不同系统观察到的残留涂片层相似,除了往复系统之间的数量不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号