首页> 外文期刊>Escola Anna Nery >Validation of the Brazilian version of the Gaudenz-Fragebogen : used in the differential diagnosis of female urinary incontinence
【24h】

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Gaudenz-Fragebogen : used in the differential diagnosis of female urinary incontinence

机译:巴西版Gaudenz-Fragebogen的验证:用于女性尿失禁的鉴别诊断

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To validate the Brazilian version of the Gaudenz-Fragebogen questionnaire, used in the differential diagnosis of female stress and urge urinary incontinence. Methods: Reliability was validated through the application of test-retest in 60 women. For the evaluation of the concurrent validity criterion, the diagnoses-based on the questionnaire's adapted scores-were compared to the urodynamic study (gold standard) in 116 women with urinary incontinence. Results: The questionnaire was found to be reliable and showed stability. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence were 9.0% and 96.7%, and for urge urinary incontinence, 44.7% and 70% respectively. Conclusion: The questionnaire is reliable and stable, and it is suitable to be included in the phases that precede the final diagnosis. However, its use is not recommended as a single resource to determine the differential diagnosis of female urinary incontinence.
机译:目的:验证巴西版的Gaudenz-Fragebogen问卷,该问卷可用于女性压力和急迫性尿失禁的鉴别诊断。方法:通过对60名女性进行重测来验证其可靠性。为了评估并发有效性标准,将基于问卷的适应性评分进行的诊断与116例尿失禁女性的尿动力学研究(金标准)进行了比较。结果:调查问卷被认为是可靠的并且具有稳定性。诊断压力性尿失禁的敏感性和特异性分别为9.0%和96.7%,对于急迫性尿失禁的诊断分别为44.7%和70%。结论:该调查表可靠,稳定,适合在最终诊断之前的阶段中使用。但是,不建议将其用作确定女性尿失禁的鉴别诊断的单一资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号