首页> 外文期刊>ESC Heart Failure >Global longitudinal strain corrected by RR interval is a superior predictor of all‐cause mortality in patients with systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation
【24h】

Global longitudinal strain corrected by RR interval is a superior predictor of all‐cause mortality in patients with systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation

机译:通过RR间隔校正的整体纵向应变是收缩性心力衰竭和心房颤动患者全因死亡率的较好预测指标

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims Quantification of systolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. A novel approach, based on RR interval correction, to counteract the varying heart cycle lengths in AF has recently been proposed. Whether this method is superior in patients with systolic heart failure (HFrEF) with AF remains unknown. This study investigates the prognostic value of RR interval‐corrected peak global longitudinal strain {GLSc?=?GLS/[RR^(1/2)]} in relation to all‐cause mortality in HFrEF patients displaying AF during echocardiographic examination. Methods and results Echocardiograms from 151 patients with HFrEF and AF during examination were analysed offline. Peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) was averaged from 18 myocardial segments obtained from three apical views. GLS was indexed with the square root of the RR interval {GLSc?=?GLS/[RR^(1/2)]}. Endpoint was all‐cause mortality. During a median follow‐up of 2.7?years, 40 patients (26.5%) died. Neither uncorrected GLS ( P ?=?0.056) nor left ventricular ejection fraction ( P ?=?0.053) was significantly associated with all‐cause mortality. After RR^(1/2) indexation, GLSc became a significant predictor of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.22, P ?=?0.014, per %/s^(1/2) decrease). GLSc remained an independent predictor of mortality after multivariable adjustment (age, sex, mean heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, left atrial volume index, and E/e′) (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.31, P ?=?0.005 per %/s^(1/2) decrease). Conclusions Decreasing {GLSc?=?GLS/[RR^(1/2)]}, but not uncorrected GLS nor left ventricular ejection fraction, was significantly associated with increased risk of all‐cause mortality in HFrEF patients with AF and remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment.
机译:目的对房颤(AF)患者的收缩功能进行量化具有挑战性。最近,提出了一种基于RR间隔校正的新方法来抵消AF中不断变化的心动周期长度。这种方法在患有AF的收缩性心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中是否优越尚不清楚。这项研究调查了在超声心动图检查期间显示AF的HFrEF患者中,RR间期校正的峰值总体纵向应变{GLSc?=?GLS / [RR ^(1/2)]}与全因死亡率的预后价值。方法和结果离线分析了151例HFrEF和AF患者的超声心动图。从三个心尖视图获得的18个心肌节段中平均峰值总纵向应变(GLS)。用RR间隔的平方根来索引GLS {GLSc≥ΔGLS/ [RR ^(1/2)]}。终点是全因死亡率。在2.7年的中位随访期间,有40名患者(26.5%)死亡。未校正的GLS(P = 0.056)和左心室射血分数(P = 0.053)与全因死亡率均无显着相关。 RR ^(1/2)指数后,GLSc成为全因死亡率的重要预测指标(危险比1.16,95%置信区间1.02-1.22,P == 0.014,每%/ s ^(1/2)降低)。在进行多变量调整(年龄,性别,平均心率,平均动脉血压,左心房容积指数和E / e')后,GLSc仍然是死亡率的独立预测因子(危险比1.17,95%置信区间1.05-1.31,P? =≤0.005 /%/ s ^(1/2)降低)。结论降低{GLSc?=?GLS / [RR ^(1/2)]},而不是未校正的GLS或左心室射血分数,与HFrEF合并AF的全因死亡率风险显着相关,并且仍然是独立的多变量调整后的预测变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号