首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, Residential Segregation, and Spatial Variation in Noise Exposure in the Contiguous United States
【24h】

Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, Residential Segregation, and Spatial Variation in Noise Exposure in the Contiguous United States

机译:连续美国的种族/民族,社会经济地位,居住区隔离和噪声暴露的空间变化

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Prior research has reported disparities in environmental exposures in the United States, but, to our knowledge, no nationwide studies have assessed inequality in noise pollution. Objectives: We aimed to a ) assess racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in noise pollution in the contiguous United States; and b ) consider the modifying role of metropolitan level racial residential segregation. Methods: We used a geospatial sound model to estimate census block group–level median (L50) nighttime and daytime noise exposure and 90th percentile (L10) daytime noise exposure. Block group variables from the 2006–2010 American Community Survey (ACS) included race/ethnicity, education, income, poverty, unemployment, homeownership, and linguistic isolation. We estimated associations using polynomial terms in spatial error models adjusted for total population and population density. We also evaluated the relationship between race/ethnicity and noise, stratified by levels of metropolitan area racial residential segregation, classified using a multigroup dissimilarity index. Results: Generally, estimated nighttime and daytime noise levels were higher for census block groups with higher proportions of nonwhite and lower-socioeconomic status (SES) residents. For example, estimated nighttime noise levels in urban block groups with 75% vs. 0% black residents were 46.3 A-weighted decibels (dBA) [interquartile range (IQR): 44.3–47.8?dBA] and 42.3?dBA (IQR: 40.4–45.5?dBA), respectively. In urban block groups with 50% vs. 0% of residents living below poverty, estimated nighttime noise levels were 46.9?dBA (IQR: 44.7–48.5?dBA) and 44.0?dBA (IQR: 42.2–45.5?dBA), respectively. Block groups with the highest metropolitan area segregation had the highest estimated noise exposures, regardless of racial composition. Results were generally consistent between urban and suburban/rural census block groups, and for daytime and nighttime noise and robust to different spatial weight and neighbor definitions. Conclusions: We found evidence of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences in model-based estimates of noise exposure throughout the United States. Additional research is needed to determine if differences in noise exposure may contribute to health disparities in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP898.
机译:背景:先前的研究报告了美国环境暴露的差异,但是据我们所知,没有全国性的研究评估噪声污染中的不平等。目标:我们的目标是:a)评估美国连续性噪声污染中的种族/种族和社会经济不平等现象; b)考虑大城市层面种族居民隔离的改变作用。方法:我们使用地理空间声音模型来估计人口普查区组的夜间和白天噪声中位数(L 50 )和白天噪声暴露的90%(L 10 )。 2006-2010年美国社区调查(ACS)中的分组变量包括种族/民族,教育,收入,贫困,失业,房屋所有权和语言隔离。我们在针对总人口和人口密度调整后的空间误差模型中使用多项式项估计了关联。我们还评估了种族/族裔与噪音之间的关系,并根据大都市地区种族居民隔离程度进行了分层,并使用多组差异指数进行了分类。结果:通常,非白人居民和较低社会经济地位(SES)居民比例较高的人口普查小组的夜间和白天噪声水平估计较高。例如,在城市居民中,有75%的黑人居民和0%的黑人居民的夜间噪声水平估计为46.3 A加权分贝(dBA)[四分位间距(IQR):44.3–47.8?dBA]和42.3?dBA(IQR:40.4) –45.5?dBA)。在生活在贫困线以下的居民中有50%和0%的城市街区组中,估计的夜间噪声水平分别为46.9?dBA(IQR:44.7-48.5?dBA)和44.0?dBA(IQR:42.2-45.5?dBA)。大都市区隔离度最高的街区群体,无论种族构成如何,其估计的噪声暴露都最高。在城市和郊区/农村人口普查区组之间,结果总体上是一致的;对于白天和晚上的噪声,结果对不同的空间权重和邻居定义具有鲁棒性。结论:在整个美国基于模型的噪声暴露估计中,我们发现了种族/种族和社会经济差异的证据。需要进行进一步的研究,以确定噪声暴露的差异是否可能导致美国的健康差异。 https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP898。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号