...
首页> 外文期刊>Ethnobotany Research and Applications >Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Knowledge on Use and Management of Wild Edible Plants: The case of central East Shewa of Ethiopia
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Knowledge on Use and Management of Wild Edible Plants: The case of central East Shewa of Ethiopia

机译:野生食用植物使用和管理方面的土著知识比较分析:以埃塞俄比亚中部东谢瓦为例

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Quantitative ethnobotanical analysis of indigenous use and management practices of wild edible plants (WEPs) by transhumant and settled farmers was conducted to compare WEPs and associated indigenous knowledge (IK). Household interviews, key informant discussions, focus group discussions, field explorations and multistage direct matrix rankings were carried out to identify WEPs in six study sites of two districts in semiarid East Shewa, Ethiopia. Participant observations were made to identify local strategies of management of WEPs. The results showed that from 40 WEPs, 35 (87.5%) of them were also used for forage/fodder, and 37 (92.5%) for fuel wood. Forest is a common habitat for collection of these plants. Jaccard’s Similarity Coefficient of the three use categories were 44.2%, 46.9% and 45.6% respectively. No gender differentiation was observed regarding their knowledge of habitats of WEPs collection. 42.2% of transhumant informants attested that intergenerational transfer of IK is the responsibility of the entire community while in the case of settled farmers this is left to fathers and mothers (23.3%). There were significant variations in transferring IK (P<0.05) between the two communities. Transhumants conserve WEPs in pasture land and protect vegetation while settled farmers employ traditional dryland agroforestry, living fences and farm boarders. Study communities have significant variation in their preference for WEPs (P<0.05). The people showed greater preferences for five WEPs. The prioritized WEPs and associated IK and practices should be considered in planning conservation and sustainable use of WEPs by integrating the variations and complementing with appropriate modern practices.
机译:对超人类和定居农民对野生食用植物(WEP)的本地使用和管理实践进行了定量的民族植物学分析,以比较WEP和相关的本地知识(IK)。在埃塞俄比亚半干旱东谢瓦的两个地区的六个研究地点,进行了住户访谈,关键信息提供者讨论,焦点小组讨论,现场调查和多阶段直接矩阵排名,以识别WEP。与会者观察到确定WEP管理的本地策略。结果表明,在40个WEP中,其中35个(87.5%)也用作草料/饲料,37个(92.5%)用于薪柴。森林是收集这些植物的常见栖息地。 Jaccard的三种使用类别的相似系数分别为44.2%,46.9%和45.6%。关于他们对WEPs栖息地的了解,未发现性别差异。 42.2%的超人类通报者证明,IK的代际转移是整个社区的责任,而对于定居的农民,这留给父母(23.3%)。两个社区之间的IK转移存在显着差异(P <0.05)。迁徙者在牧场上保存WEP并保护植被,而定居的农民则使用传统的旱地农林业,活篱笆和农场寄宿生。研究社区对WEP的偏好存在显着差异(P <0.05)。人们对五个WEP表现出更大的偏爱。在规划WEP的保护和可持续利用时,应通过整合变化并结合适当的现代实践来考虑优先的WEP和相关的IK和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号