首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Research Letters >Keeping a closer eye on fossil fuel CO2
【24h】

Keeping a closer eye on fossil fuel CO2

机译:密切关注化石燃料二氧化碳

获取原文
           

摘要

The world is watching expectantly as the clock winds down towards the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP15; http://en.cop15.dk/) to be held 7–18 December 2009 in Copenhagen. While most are now convinced of the need for a strong and concerted response to the climate challenge, the exact nature and extent of that response remains uncertain. There is evidence (Barnett 2009) that current estimates of emissions now exceed all but the most extreme emission scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). If that increase in emissions persists then temperature increases of 4 °C by 2060 have been predicted (Barnett 2009). An inevitable result of the potential for such extreme climate change is to advance the need for multiple adaptation strategies to decision making about, for example, infrastructure, urban planning and forest management. These strategies need to do more than incremental adaptation (Barnett 2009); instead transformative approaches may be required to adapt. The timing of the response is also proving to be a critical determining factor in the effectiveness of global actions. Using a simple conceptual model of emissions, Vaughan and co-workers (Vaughan et al 2009) show that avoiding dangerous climate change is more effective if such action begins early. Early action is also more effective than acting more aggressively later (Vaughan et al 2009). Uncertainties, although reduced, are still significant in the science of climate change. The interactions between control of particulate air pollutants and climate change are particularly challenging (Arneth et al 2009, Shindell et al 2009) but many other uncertainties require continuing research. The scientific uncertainties are only one aspect of an intense interdisciplinary, political, economic and cultural dialogue. It is clear that political will, economic interest, target setting for emissions reductions, adaptation, technology and financing (Pan 2009) will all have a major influence on progress to an international agreement. It is important that the political challenges are not underestimated. Long-term observers of the negotiations necessary for global agreements (Inman 2009) are pessimistic about the chances for success at COP15, and argue that agreements between smaller groups of countries may be more effective. China and other developing countries clearly expect greater emission cuts by developed nations as a condition for a successful deal (Pan 2009). Conversely, the constraints on US climate policies are considerable, notably those imposed by fears that an international agreement that does not include equitable emission control measures for developing countries like China and India, will compromise the agreement and reduce its effectiveness (Skodvin and Andresen 2009). In this context the need for earlier, and more reliable, information on emissions is a high priority. Myhre and coworkers (Myhre et al 2009) provide an efficient method for calculating global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion by combining industry statistics with data from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC; http://cdiac.ornl.gov/). Recent analyses of carbon dioxide emission data show a worrying acceleration in emissions, beyond even the most extreme IPCC projections, but are based largely on the CDIAC which gives information about emissions released two to three years before real time (Canadell et al 2007, Raupach et al 2007). The approach used by Myhre et al (2009) uses BP annual statistics of fossil fuel consumption and has a much shorter lag, of the order of six months. Of significant concern is that their analysis of the data also reveals that the recent strong increase in fossil fuel CO2 is largely driven by an increase in emissions from coal, most significantly in China. By contrast, emissions from oil and gas continue to follow longer-term historical trends. Earlier and accurate data on CO2 emissions is important for a
机译:随着时间的流逝,即将到来的世界正等待着即将到来的2009年12月7日至18日在哥本哈根举行的联合国气候变化会议(COP15; http://en.cop15.dk/)。现在,大多数人相信有必要对气候挑战采取强有力的协调一致的应对措施,但这种应对措施的确切性质和范围仍然不确定。有证据(Barnett,2009年)表明,目前的排放估算值超出了政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)制定的最极端的排放情景。如果排放量的这种增加持续存在,那么到2060年温度将上升4°C(Barnett 2009)。这种极端气候变化的潜在必然结果是,需要将多种适应策略用于基础设施,城市规划和森林管理等决策。这些策略需要做的不仅仅是渐进式适应(Barnett 2009)。相反,可能需要采用变革性的方法来适应。响应的时机也被证明是全球行动有效性的关键决定因素。沃恩及其同事使用简单的排放概念模型(沃恩等人,2009年)表明,如果尽早开始采取行动,避免危险的气候变化会更加有效。尽早采取行动比晚些采取行动更为有效(Vaughan等,2009)。尽管不确定性有所降低,但在气候变化科学中仍然具有重大意义。颗粒空气污染物的控制与气候变化之间的相互作用特别具有挑战性(Arneth等,2009; Shindell等,2009),但许多其他不确定性需要继续研究。科学的不确定性只是激烈的跨学科,政治,经济和文化对话的一方面。显然,政治意愿,经济利益,减排目标设定,适应,技术和融资(Pan 2009)都将对国际协议的进展产生重大影响。重要的是,不要低估政治挑战。全球协议必要的谈判的长期观察者(Inman,2009年)对第15届联合国气候变化大会的成功机会感到悲观,并认为较小的国家集团之间的协议可能更有效。中国和其他发展中国家显然希望发达国家进一步削减排放量,这是成功达成交易的条件(Pan 2009)。相反,对美国气候政策的约束相当可观,尤其是担心如果一项不包含针对中国和印度等发展中国家的公平排放控制措施的国际协议会损害该协议并降低其有效性的话(Skodvin and Andresen 2009) 。在这种情况下,需要更早,更可靠的排放信息是当务之急。 Myhre及其同事(Myhre等,2009)通过将行业统计数据与二氧化碳信息分析中心(CDIAC; http://cdiac.ornl.gov/)的数据相结合,提供了一种有效的方法来计算化石燃料燃烧产生的全球二氧化碳排放量。 。最近对二氧化碳排放量数据的分析表明,排放量的加速增长令人担忧,甚至超出了IPCC的最极端的预测,但主要基于CDIAC,它提供了有关实时排放两到三年之前释放的排放量的信息(Canadell等,2007; Raupach等(2007)。 Myhre等人(2009)使用的方法使用了BP的化石燃料消耗年度统计数据,并且滞后时间要短得多,大约为六个月。值得关注的是,他们对数据的分析还表明,最近化石燃料CO2的强劲增长在很大程度上是由煤炭排放量增加所驱动的,在中国尤为明显。相反,石油和天然气的排放继续遵循长期的历史趋势。早期和准确的二氧化碳排放数据对于

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号