首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Economics >Fiscal Harmonization and Economic Integration in the European Union
【24h】

Fiscal Harmonization and Economic Integration in the European Union

机译:欧盟的财政协调与经济一体化

获取原文
           

摘要

Since the foundation of the European Economic Community there is an incessant debate about the necessity of an overall tax and fiscal cooperation and harmonization in Europe, which recently has been intensified mainly because of EMU. By reviewing the literature, this article argues that closer cooperation in tax issues, for both indirect and direct taxation, needs to accompany the current state of integration in the EU. Advances have taken place in indirect taxes, value added tax (VAT) and excises. With respect to VAT, the major agreements were achieved with the Sixth VAT Directive (1977) and the agreements on rates after the elimination of the frontier controls (1992). In the case of excise duties, the progress have been less significant and there can be noted only the agreements of minimum rates for alcohol, tobacco and energy (fuels). In direct taxation, it is necessary to point out that the powers are national and the EU is limited to guaranteeing the performance of the single market. Community legislation is centered on company taxation and the taxation of savings income. Taxes and social security contributions strongly influence patterns of saving, consumption, investment and employment, and thus shape the operation of markets for goods, services, capital and labor. The reforms launched by the Cardiff European Council of June 1998 are designed to ensure that the differences between systems that have become even more apparent since the introduction of the euro do not hamper trade, result in fragmentation of the single market or prevent the efficient allocation of resources. Tax fraud is another problem of increasing concern in the Community. European Parliament and Council Decision 888/98/EC instituted a program (Fiscalis) to improve the operation of indirect taxation systems in the single market and to secure wide-ranging and effective cooperation between Member States and with the Commission, and to improve administrative practice. International VAT fraud, particularly on sales and deliveries within the EU, has led to serious losses of revenue. Only through closer coordination of national tax policies a balance can be struck between the diversity of Member States’ tax and social contribution systems and the right to the freedom of establishment and movement throughout the EU. In a monetary union, with one currency and common policies, a larger harmonization and coordination of the fiscal policies are forced. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.1.3503
机译:自欧洲经济共同体成立以来,人们就欧洲全面税收和财政合作与协调的必要性不断进行辩论,最近主要由于欧洲货币联盟而加剧了这种辩论。通过回顾文献,本文认为,在税收问题上,无论是间接税收还是直接税收,都需要进行更紧密的合作,以配合欧盟目前的一体化状况。间接税,增值税(VAT)和消费税已取得进展。关于增值税,主要的协定是与第六个增值税指令(1977年)和取消边境管制后的税率协定(1992年)达成的。就消费税而言,进展并不那么重要,只能指出酒精,烟草和能源(燃料)最低税率的协议。在直接征税中,有必要指出,权力是国家权力,欧盟仅限于保证单一市场的表现。社区立法的重点是公司税收和储蓄收入税收。税收和社会保障缴款在很大程度上影响着储蓄,消费,投资和就业的方式,从而影响着商品,服务,资本和劳动力市场的运作。 1998年6月由卡迪夫欧洲理事会发起的改革旨在确保自引入欧元以来变得更加明显的体系之间的差异不会妨碍贸易,导致单一市场的分裂或阻止对欧元的有效分配。资源。税务欺诈是社区日益关注的另一个问题。欧洲议会和理事会第888/98 / EC号决定制定了一个计划(Fiscalis),以改善单一市场上的间接税制运作,并确保成员国之间以及与委员会之间的广泛有效合作,并改善行政管理实践。国际增值税欺诈,特别是欧盟内部的销售和交货欺诈,已导致严重的收入损失。只有通过更紧密地协调国家税收政策,才能在成员国税收和社会贡献体系的多样性与整个欧盟的建立和迁徙自由权之间取得平衡。在只有一种货币和共同政策的货币联盟中,必须更大程度地协调和协调财政政策。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.1.3503

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号