首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >The difference in ocular lens equivalent dose to ERCP personnel between prone and left lateral decubitus positions: a prospective randomized study
【24h】

The difference in ocular lens equivalent dose to ERCP personnel between prone and left lateral decubitus positions: a prospective randomized study

机译:俯卧位与左卧位之间向ERCP人员的晶状体等效剂量的差异:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in a prone or left lateral decubitus (LLD) position. The ocular lens equivalent doses between the two positions may be different because in the LLD position the tube voltage will automatically increase to maintain the image quality, and the increased distance between the image intensifier and the X-ray tube may result in more scattered radiation. We aimed to compare the ocular lens equivalent doses of ERCP personnel between the two different positions. Patients and methods Fifty-five patients with ERCP indications were randomized to either prone or LLD positions. One patient in an LLD position was excluded due to technical reasons. Indications for ERCP, patients’ vertical thicknesses, fluoroscopy parameters, patients’ skin dose rates, and the ocular-lens equivalent doses of ERCP personnel were compared. Results Baseline characteristics were no different except for vertical thickness, which was significantly higher in the LLD group.?The ocular lens equivalent doses (prone vs. LLD) of the primary endoscopist (19.2 vs. 30.7?μSv, P =?0.035), and the nurse anesthetist (17.3 vs. 42.2?μSv, P =?0.002) were significantly lower in the prone group than in the LLD group.?The calculated annual number of procedures not to exceed the exposure allowance in prone and LLD positions were 1,042 and 651 procedures for the primary endoscopist and 1,157 and 473 procedures for the nurse anesthetist, respectively. Conclusions Ocular-radiation exposure to ERCP personnel was one-third lower in the prone than in LLD position. Therefore, more annual ERCPs could be performed by the personnel.
机译:背景和研究目的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)通常在俯卧或左侧卧位(LLD)位置进行。两个位置之间的眼镜等效剂量可能会有所不同,因为在LLD位置,管电压将自动增加以保持图像质量,并且图像增强器和X射线管之间的距离增加可能会导致更多的散射辐射。我们旨在比较两个不同位置之间的ERCP人员的晶状体等效剂量。患者和方法将55名ERCP适应症患者随机分为俯卧位或LLD位。由于技术原因,排除了一名处于LLD位置的患者。比较了ERCP的适应症,患者的垂直厚度,荧光透视参数,患者的皮肤剂量率以及ERCP人员的眼镜等效剂量。结果基线特征除了垂直厚度外没有其他差异,LLD组明显高于基线厚度。初级内镜医师的晶状体等效剂量(俯卧vs. LLD)(19.2 vs. 30.7?Sv,P =?0.035),俯卧组的护士麻醉师(17.3 vs. 42.2?Sv,P = 0.002)显着低于LLD组。计算出的每年不超过俯卧位和LLD位置的暴露量的程序为1,042对于初级内镜医师,分别为651例和1,157和473例。结论ERCP人员的眼部放射线俯卧位比LLD位置低三分之一。因此,人员可以执行更多的年度ERCP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号