首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Assessing the safety of physician-directed nurse-administered propofol sedation in low-risk patients undergoing endoscopy and colonoscopy
【24h】

Assessing the safety of physician-directed nurse-administered propofol sedation in low-risk patients undergoing endoscopy and colonoscopy

机译:评估由医生指导的护士使用丙泊酚镇静剂对低风险患者进行内镜和结肠镜检查的安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and study aims?Physician-directed nurse-administered balanced propofol sedation (PhD NAPS) in patients undergoing endoscopy and/or colonoscopy is being increasingly utilized worldwide. However, this method of sedation is not universally employed in Australian hospitals due to concerns surrounding its safety. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of PhD NAPS in low-risk patients undergoing endoscopy and/or colonoscopy. Patients and methods?This study was conducted at a single tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, Australia. It was a prospective study involving 1000 patients with an ASA score of 1?–?3 presenting with any indication for endoscopy, colonoscopy or both. A total of 981 patients (451 male) with a mean age of 53 years (range: 16?–?87) were recruited from January 2010 to October 2012. 440 endoscopies, 420 colonoscopies, and 121 combined procedures were performed. The intra-procedural adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results?There were no major intra-procedural adverse events. Minor AEs occurred in 6.42?% of patients, and resolved spontaneously or with intravenous fluid boluses in all cases. Conclusion?PhD NAPS is safe when the proceduralist and nursing staff are adequately trained and strict patient selection criteria are used.
机译:背景和研究目的?在全世界范围内,越来越多地采用由医生指导的护士进行内镜和/或结肠镜检查的镇静丙泊酚镇静剂(PhD NAPS)。但是,出于对安全性的关注,这种镇静方法并未在澳大利亚医院普遍采用。这项研究的目的是评估PhD NAPS在接受内窥镜检查和/或结肠镜检查的低风险患者中的安全性。患者和方法?这项研究是在澳大利亚阿德莱德的一家三级教学医院进行的。这是一项前瞻性研究,涉及1000名ASA评分为1?–?3的患者,这些患者具有内镜,结肠镜或两者兼有的适应症。从2010年1月至2012年10月,共招募了981名患者(451名男性),平均年龄为53岁(范围:16?-?87)。进行了440例内镜检查,420例结肠镜检查和121例联合手术。记录过程中不良事件(AE)。结果:没有重大的术中不良事件。轻微不良事件发生在6.42%的患者中,并在所有情况下均自发缓解或静脉推注。结论:对程序师和护理人员进行充分的培训并使用严格的患者选择标准时,PhD NAPS是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号