Review of quantitative assessment of risk reduction options applied in the EFSA outputs on biological hazards, in support of a guidance document of the EFSA Panel on Plant Health

Marco Pautasso

首页> 外文期刊>EFSA supporting publications >Review of quantitative assessment of risk reduction options applied in the EFSA outputs on biological hazards, in support of a guidance document of the EFSA Panel on Plant Health

【24h】

Review of quantitative assessment of risk reduction options applied in the EFSA outputs on biological hazards, in support of a guidance document of the EFSA Panel on Plant Health

机译：审查在欧洲食品安全局关于生物危害的输出中应用的减少风险的方案的定量评估，以支持欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组的指导文件

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Review of quantitative assessment of risk reduction options applied in the EFSA outputs on biological hazards, in support of a guidance document of the EFSA Panel on Plant Health.

机译：审查在欧洲食品安全局关于生物危害的输出中应用的减少风险的方案的定量评估，以支持欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组的指导文件。

著录项

来源
《EFSA supporting publications》 |2012年第6期|共168页
作者
Marco Pautasso;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类食品安全与卫生;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 10:02:54

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Scientific services to support EFSA systematic reviews: Lot 5 Extensive literature search and reviews as preparatory work for the update of the Guidance of EFSA on the Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals with regards to dermal and inhalation exposure (Tender specifications RC/EFSA/PRAS/2013/02) [J] . Steve Fryday, Nick Jarratt, Jonathan Stein EFSA supporting publications . 2014,第7期

机译：支持EFSA系统审查的科学服务：第5批进行了广泛的文献检索和审查，作为更新EFSA关于皮肤和吸入暴露的鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估指南的准备工作（招标规范RC / EFSA / PRAS / 2013/02）
2. Technical report of EFSA prepared by the Assessment Methodology Unit on Quantitative pathway analysis of the exposure of the wheat production area with Tilletia indica M. teliospores one year after importation of US wheat for grain into the EU and desert durum wheat into Italy. Appendix B to the Scientific Opinion on a quantitative pathway analysis of the likelihood of Tilletia indica M. introduction into EU with importation of US wheat of EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) [J] . EFSA Journal . 2010,第6期

机译：由评估方法学部门编写的EFSA的技术报告，即在将美国小麦进口到欧盟和沙漠硬粒小麦后一年，对小麦产区暴露于印度线虫（Tilletia indica teliospores）的定量途径分析小麦进入意大利。《科学意见》附录B中的定量途径分析，是将EFSA植物健康小组（PLH）引入美国的小麦后，可能将印度的T虫（Tilletia indica）引入欧盟。
3. Summary and conclusions of the Joint EFSA-EPPO Workshop: Modelling in Plant Health - how can models support risk assessment of plant pests and decision-making?Parma, Italy, 12-14 December 2016 EFSA-EPPO Modelling Workshop [J] . M. Suffert, F. Petter, M. Ward Bulletin OEPP: = EPPO Bulletin . 2017,第2期

机译：联合EFSA-EPPO研讨会的摘要和结论：植物健康建模 - 模型如何支持植物害虫和决策风险评估？帕尔马，意大利，2016年12月12日至14日EFSA-EPPO建模研讨会
4. TRANSLATING INTO PRACTICE THE EFSA GUIDANCE ON RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICATION OF NANOTECHNOLOGIES IN THE FOOD CHAIN: THE ROLE OF MASS SPECTROMETRY [C] . Federica Aureli, Francesca Ferraris, Sara Savini, International Mass Spectrometry Conference . 2018

机译：转化为实践纳米技术在食品链中纳米技术应用的风险评估指导：质谱法的作用
5. Guidance of EFSA on risk assessments for active substances of plant protection products that have stereoisomers as components or impurities and for transformation products of active substances that may have stereoisomers [O] . European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), László Bura, Anja Friel, 2019

机译：EFSA关于以立体异构体为成分或杂质的植物保护产品活性物质以及可能具有立体异构体的活性物质转化产物风险评估的指南
6. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) and EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Scientific Opinion on the minimum hygiene criteria to be applied to clean seawater and on the public health risks and hygiene criteria for bottled seawater intended for domestic use [O] . Hald Tine 2012

机译：EFsa生物危害专家组（BIOHaZ）和EFsa食品链污染物专家组（CONTam）;关于适用于清洁海水的最低卫生标准的科学意见以及供家庭使用的瓶装海水的公共卫生风险和卫生标准
7. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS). Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk Assessments) (Final Report). [R] . 2001

机译：超级基金风险评估指南（RaGs）。第1卷。人体健康评估手册（D部分，标准化规划，报告和超级基金风险评估审查）（最终报告）。

Review of quantitative assessment of risk reduction options applied in the EFSA outputs on biological hazards, in support of a guidance document of the EFSA Panel on Plant Health

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅