首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3): Consideration of genotoxic potential for α,β‐unsaturated alicyclic ketones and precursors from chemical subgroup 2.4 of FGE.19

机译:有关调味剂基团评估210修订版3(FGE.210Rev3)的科学意见:考虑α,β-不饱和脂环酮和FGE.19化学亚组的前体的遗传毒性潜力

获取原文
           

摘要

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 5 flavouring substances in Flavouring Group Evaluation 210 Revision 3 (FGE.210Rev3). In FGE.210, the Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids concluded that the genotoxic potential could not be ruled out for any of the flavouring substances. In FGE.210Rev1, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for eight substances [FL‐no: 02.105, 07.007, 07.009, 07.011, 07.036, 07.088, 07.091 and 07.170]. In FGE.210 Rev2, the concern for genotoxic potential has been ruled out for allyl α‐ionone [FL‐no: 07.061]. In the present revision of FGE 210 (FGE.210Rev3), additional in vitro and in vivo data on the representative substance α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] are evaluated. To investigate equivocal and positive results observed in in vitro micronucleus studies, an in vivo combined micronucleus (bone marrow) and comet assay (liver and duodenum) was performed. α‐Damascone did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow and no primary DNA damage in duodenum; however, an increase in primary DNA damage was observed in liver. This positive result was attributed by the applicant to a high level of peroxides in the sample tested. Therefore, the comet assay was repeated with a new sample of α‐damascone, confirming the negative results observed in duodenum, but equivocal results were observed in liver. Two additional in vivo comet assays in liver were performed in order to clarify the potential impact of peroxides on the obtained results from the genotoxicity testing. However, the materials studied in these tests were not suitable to establish the potential role of peroxides in the genotoxicity of α‐damascone. The Panel concluded that the concern for genotoxicity cannot be ruled out for α‐damascone [FL‐no: 07.134] and the four structurally related substances [FL‐no: 07.130, 07.225, 07.226 and 07.231].
机译:要求欧洲食品安全局食品添加剂和调味料小组在调味剂组评估210修订版3(FGE.210Rev3)中评估5种调味剂的遗传毒性潜力。在FGE.210中,食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组的结论是,不能排除任何调味剂的潜在遗传毒性。在FGE.210Rev1中,已经排除了对8种物质的潜在遗传毒性的担忧[FL-no:02.105、07.007、07.009、07.011、07.036、07.088、07.091和07.170]。在FGE.210 Rev2中,已排除了烯丙基α-紫罗兰酮对遗传毒性的担忧[FL-no:07.061]。在当前版本的FGE 210(FGE.210Rev3)中,评估了有关代表性物质α-金刚烷酮[FL-no:07.134]的其他体内和体外数据。为了调查在体外微核研究中观察到的模棱两可和积极的结果,进行了体内联合的微核(骨髓)和彗星试验(肝和十二指肠)。 α-Damascone不会在骨髓中诱导微核,十二指肠中也不会发生原发性DNA损伤。然而,在肝脏中观察到初级DNA损伤的增加。申请人将此积极结果归因于所测试样品中的高水平过氧化物。因此,用新的α-大马士革样品重复进行了彗星试验,证实了在十二指肠中观察到阴性结果,但在肝脏中观察到了模棱两可的结果。为了阐明过氧化物对遗传毒性测试获得的结果的潜在影响,在肝脏中进行了两次其他的体内彗星试验。但是,在这些测试中研究的材料不适合确定过氧化物在α-大马士革的遗传毒性中的潜在作用。专家小组的结论是,不能排除α-大马康酮[FL-no:07.134]和四种与结构相关的物质[FL-no:07.130、07.225、07.226和07.231]引起的基因毒性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号