首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 63, Revision 3 (FGE.63Rev3): aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (59th and 69th meetings) structurally related to saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters of secondary alcohols and saturated linear or branched‐chain carboxylic acids evaluated by EFSA in FGE.07Rev4
【24h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 63, Revision 3 (FGE.63Rev3): aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (59th and 69th meetings) structurally related to saturated and unsaturated aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and esters of secondary alcohols and saturated linear or branched‐chain carboxylic acids evaluated by EFSA in FGE.07Rev4

机译:关于调味组评估63的科学意见,修订版3(FGE.63Rev3):JECFA(第五十九次和第六十九次会议)评估的脂肪族仲醇,酮和相关酯的结构与饱和和不饱和脂肪族仲醇,酮和仲醇的酯有关由EFSA在FGE.07Rev4中评估的饱和直链或支链羧酸

获取原文
           

摘要

The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to consider evaluations of flavouring substances assessed since 2000 by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), and to decide whether further evaluation is necessary, as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/20001. The present consideration concerns a group of 29 aliphatic secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA at the 59th and 69th meetings in 2002 and 2008. This revision is made due to the inclusion of nine additional substances cleared for genotoxicity concern in FGE.205 Revision 1. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach that integrates information on structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel agrees with the application of the Procedure as performed by JECFA for all 29 substances considered in this FGE. For all substances, the Panel concludes that there is ‘no safety concern at the estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances based on the MSDI approach’. For all 29 substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered and found adequate. Ten out of the 14 substances for which use levels became available exceed the modified theoretical added maximum daily intake (mTAMDI) and more reliable exposure data are required to finalise their evaluation. On the basis of such data, additional toxicological data might become necessary. For 15 substances, use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDIs in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment to finalise the evaluation.
机译:要求欧洲食品安全局食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组考虑自2000年以来由粮农组织/世卫组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)评估的调味剂评估,并决定是否有必要进一步评估,因为根据委员会法规(EC)1565/20001的规定。本考虑事项涉及由JECFA在2002年和2008年的第59次和第69次会议上评估的一组29种脂族仲醇,酮和相关酯。进行此修订是由于在FGE.205中包括了9种已清除的具有遗传毒性的物质。修订版1.通过逐步方法评估了这些物质,该方法综合了结构与活性之间的关系,当前使用量,所关注的毒理学阈值以及有关代谢和毒性的可用数据。专家组同意本FGE中考虑的所有29种物质均适用JECFA程序。对于所有物质,专家组得出结论认为,“基于MSDI方法的调味物质的估计摄入量不会引起安全隐患”。对于所有29种物质,也已经考虑到商业材料的规格,并认为它们是适当的。可使用的14种物质中,有10种超过了理论上增加的最大每日最大摄入量(mTAMDI),因此需要更可靠的接触数据才能完成评估。根据此类数据,可能需要其他毒理学数据。对于15种物质,需要使用用量来计算mTAMDI,以识别那些需要更精细的暴露评估以最终完成评估的调味物质。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号