...
首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Safety assessment of the substance phosphorous acid, mixed 2,4‐bis(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl and 4‐(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl triesters for use in food contact materials
【24h】

Safety assessment of the substance phosphorous acid, mixed 2,4‐bis(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl and 4‐(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl triesters for use in food contact materials

机译:食品接触材料中使用的亚磷酸,混合的2,4-双(1,1-二甲基丙基)苯基和4-(1,1-二甲基丙基)苯基三酯的安全性评估

获取原文
           

摘要

This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF Panel) deals with the safety assessment of the substance phosphorous acid, mixed 2,4‐bis(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl and 4‐(1,1‐dimethylpropyl)phenyl triesters. The substance was evaluated by the CEF Panel in 2011 and 2,4‐di‐tert‐amylphenol, an impurity and hydrolysis product was re‐evaluated by the CEF Panel in 2015. In this application, the applicant requested an increase of the specific migration limit of the substance, currently established at 5 mg/kg food, to 10 mg/kg food, and provided new toxicological studies. Findings from three new in vitro mutagenicity assays on the oxidation products support the conclusion from 2011 that the substance and its oxidation products are not genotoxic. A new toxicokinetic study on the substance supports the consideration from the evaluation in 2011 that the substance does not raise concern for accumulation. The outcome of a new delayed neurotoxicity study on a structurally related substance, phosphorous acid, tris (2,4‐di‐tert‐butylphenyl) ester, which was considered not to cause neurotoxicity in hens, strengthens the conclusion of the Panel in 2011 that the substance does not represent a concern for neurotoxicity. From a new two‐generation reproduction toxicity study and a prenatal developmental toxicity study on the substance, a new subchronic toxicity study on its oxidation products that completes the one submitted in 2011 on the substance itself, and a 2‐year oral toxicity study on the structurally related substance, the lowest NOAEL was 58–147 mg/kg bw per day (from the 2‐year oral toxicity study). Compared to the requested increase of the migration limit, this gives an acceptable margin of safety of 348. Therefore, the CEF Panel concluded that an increase of the specific migration limit of the substance from 5 to 10 mg/kg food is not a safety concern for the consumer.
机译:EFSA食品接触材料,酶,调味剂和加工助剂小组(CEF小组)的科学意见涉及对亚磷酸,2,4-双(1,1-二甲基丙基)苯基和4- (1,1-二甲基丙基)苯基三酯。 CEF专家小组于2011年对该物质进行了评估,CEF专家小组于2015年对2,4-二叔戊基苯酚(一种杂质和水解产物)进行了重新评估。在此申请中,申请人要求提高具体迁移率目前将该物质的限量限制为每公斤食物5毫克,至每公斤食物10毫克,并提供了新的毒理学研究。氧化产物的三种新的体外诱变性测定结果支持从2011年得出的结论,即该物质及其氧化产物没有遗传毒性。对该物质的新的毒物代谢动力学研究支持从2011年的评估中考虑到该物质不会引起人们对积累的担忧。关于结构相关物质亚磷酸三(2,4-二叔丁基苯基)酯的新的延迟神经毒性研究的结果被认为不会对母鸡造成神经毒性,该结果加强了专家组在2011年的结论,即该物质不代表神经毒性。从一项新的两代生殖毒性研究和对该物质的产前发育毒性研究,一项关于其氧化产物的亚慢性毒性研究(完成于2011年提交的关于该物质本身的研究)以及一项为期两年的口服毒性研究开始。与结构相关的物质,最低NOAEL为每天58-147 mg / kg bw(来自2年口服毒性研究)。与要求增加的迁移极限相比,安全极限为348。因此,CEF小组得出结论,将物质的具体迁移极限从5 mg / kg食物提高到10 mg / kg,与安全无关。为消费者。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号