...
首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Green Journal >Shooting Sheep to Save Sagebrush: The Violence of Habitat Restoration
【24h】

Shooting Sheep to Save Sagebrush: The Violence of Habitat Restoration

机译:射杀绵羊拯救鼠尾草:生境恢复的暴力

获取原文

摘要

Shooting Sheep to Save Sagebrush: The Violence of Habitat Restoration Jo-Ann Shelton University of California, Santa Barbara Widely endorsed by environmentalists, shooting feral animals is a means to restore landscapes scarred by human activities. The goal of restoration is to secure the welfare of flora and fauna that existed in a region before the arrival of humans (especially Europeans) and their biological baggage. Maintaining healthy populations of pre-Columbian (pre-European) species is a major concern for environmentalists, whose sense of urgency is enhanced by the knowledge that so many species are threatened with extinction, and that severe damage can be done in a relatively brief period of time. Shooting species that were imported to an area by humans, and that now jeopardize species that have inhabited that area for a much longer period, seems like a simple and quick solution. But shooting is a violent act, and I think that it is appropriate, at a conference sponsored by advocates for peace, to ask whether violence is an acceptable means to reach an endpoint on which we all agree: the protection of a diversity of plant and animal life. The author will argue that the use of violence contravenes environmentalists’ claims to respect nature because it perpetuates a philosophy that humans have the right to destroy elements of nature whenever they choose. To illustrate the argument, two examples of mass shootings of grazing animals are presented. In each case, shooters justified the killing on the grounds that the targeted species did not fit in the region any more. The first example is the shooting of bison in 19th century America. The second example is the shooting of feral sheep in this decade in the area of California. The killing of bison by people of European descent occurred for several reasons: to clear the land for agriculture and herding, to profit from the sale of hides, and to have fun. The procurement of food was only one, and frequently not the primary, reason for hunting bison. In fact, very often the skinned carcasses were left where the animals had fallen. And sometimes they were not even skinned because they had been shot only for sport (Roe; Fleharty; and Danz). With the construction of railroad lines across the continent, the hunting of bison became a sport anyone could enjoy. Consider these accounts from the years 1867 and 1872
机译:射杀绵羊以拯救鼠尾草:生境恢复的暴力行为加利福尼亚州圣安芭尔顿大学圣安娜芭尔顿分校环保主义者的广泛认可是,射杀野生动物是恢复人类活动造成的景观的一种手段。恢复的目的是确保人类(尤其是欧洲人)抵达和受到其生物包before之前该地区存在的动植物的福利。维持健康的哥伦比亚前(欧洲前)物种种群是环保主义者的主要关注点,他们的紧迫感因了解到这么多物种面临灭绝的威胁而得到加强,并且可以在相对较短的时间内造成严重破坏时间。拍摄人类进口到该地区的物种,现在危害已经在该地区居住了很长时间的物种,这似乎是一种简单而快捷的解决方案。但是开枪是一种暴力行为,在和平倡导者赞助的会议上,我认为询问暴力是否是实现我们大家都同意的终点的可接受手段:保护植物和植物的多样性是适当的。动物生活。作者将辩称,使用暴力违反了环境保护论者尊重自然的主张,因为它延续了一种哲学,即人类有权随时选择破坏自然元素。为了说明这一论点,给出了两个大规模放牧动物射击的例子。在每种情况下,射手都以杀害为理由,理由是目标物种不再适合该地区。第一个例子是在19世纪美国枪杀野牛。第二个例子是这十年来加州地区射杀野性绵羊。欧洲血统的人杀死野牛的原因有几个:清理土地用于农业和放牧,从生皮销售中获利,以及玩得开心。食物的购买只是狩猎野牛的一个原因,而且通常不是主要原因。实际上,剥皮的尸体经常留在动物掉落的地方。有时它们甚至没有被剥皮,因为它们只是出于运动目的而被枪杀(Roe,Fleharty和Danz)。随着整个大陆铁路线的建设,狩猎野牛成为任何人都可以享受的运动。考虑一下1867年和1872年的这些账目

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号