首页> 外文期刊>Isra Medical Journal >COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF ORAL AZITHROMYCIN WITHINTRAVENOUS CEFTRIAXONE FOR THE TREATMENTOF UNCOMPLICATED ENTERIC FEVER
【24h】

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF ORAL AZITHROMYCIN WITHINTRAVENOUS CEFTRIAXONE FOR THE TREATMENTOF UNCOMPLICATED ENTERIC FEVER

机译:口服阿奇霉素与静脉注射头孢曲松钠治疗单纯性肠热的疗效比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of oral azithromycin and intravenous ceftriaxone for treatment of uncomplicated enteric feverand the frequency of relapse in both groups. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial PLACE AND DURATION: Study was conducted at Pediatric Medicine Ward and Emergency Department of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital from1stMay 2013 to 31stOct 2013. METHODOLOGY: Using Non probability purposive sampling, 100 patients with uncomplicated enteric fever were taken who werefulfilling the inclusion criteria. Patient was randomly divided in 2 groups using random numbers, Group "A" and Group "B", with 50 patients in each group. Group A was given ceftriaxone for 7 days. Group B was given azithromycin once a day for 7 days. A culture wasrepeated at day 4 of therapy. Both groups were compared for efficacy and relapse. RESULTS: Efficacy achieved by oral azithromycin as well as intravenous ceftriaxone in treatment of uncomplicated enteric fever wasstatistically same. There were 11 patients in Ceftriaxone group (A) with relapse. There were 3 patients in Azithromycin group withrelapse. The rate of relapse was different statistically in both groups. CONCLUSION: Efficacy achieved by both the oral azithromycin and intravenous ceftriaxone in treatment of uncomplicated entericfever was satisfactory and statistically same. However, higher rate of relapse was observed in group treated by intravenous ceftriaxonecompared to oral azithromycin.
机译:目的:探讨口服阿奇霉素和头孢曲松钠治疗单纯性肠热的疗效及复发频率。研究设计:一项随机对照试验地点和时间:研究于2013年5月1日至2013年10月31日在甘加拉姆爵士医院的儿科病房和急诊室进行。方法:采用非概率目的抽样,收集了100例符合纳入标准的单纯性肠热患者。使用随机数将患者随机分为2组,即“ A”组和“ B”组,每组50名患者。 A组给予头孢曲松治疗7天。 B组每天一次给予阿奇霉素,共7天。在治疗的第4天重复培养。比较两组的疗效和复发率。结果:口服阿奇霉素和头孢曲松静脉注射治疗单纯性肠热的疗效在统计学上是相同的。头孢曲松组(A)有11例复发。阿奇霉素组3例复发。两组的复发率在统计学上不同。结论:口服阿奇霉素和静脉注射头孢曲松钠治疗单纯性肠热均疗效满意,统计学上相同。然而,与口服阿奇霉素相比,静脉注射头孢曲松治疗组的复发率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号