首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Green Journal >Pragmatism, Environmental World Views, and Sustainability
【24h】

Pragmatism, Environmental World Views, and Sustainability

机译:实用主义,环境世界观和可持续性

获取原文
       

摘要

Pragmatism, Environmental World Views, and Sustainability Eric Reitan Seattle University Introduction: Environmental Pragmatism Over the last several years, there has been an emerging discussion among environmental philosophers over the question of whether philosophical pragmatism can have a place of value in the environmental movement. Pragmatism is the distinctively American philosophical school which, roughly, holds that our ideas, theories, and worldviews should be examined and evaluated in the light of their impact on lived experience, according to how well they enable us to maneuver through experience successfully. Some worry that pragmatism’s tendency to root all values in subjective human experience undercuts the environmentalist’s claim that all of us ought to care about nature, because nature has an intrinsic value independent of the human activity of valuing. (Katz 1987) Others insist that pragmatism’s tendency to view individuals as inextricably connected to their field of experience--to their environment--can serve as the basis for environmental concern. (Parker 1996) What has not been explicitly noted in these discussions is that one of the key ideas advocated in current environmental theory--specifically, the idea that the contemporary consumerist worldview is largely to blame for our current environmental crisis, and any solution to that crisis must be driven by a change in worldview-- is itself an essentially pragmatic idea. I would like to explore the significance of this fact for those environmental theorists who embrace this idea. My suggestion is that, while not committed to all the traditional aspects of philosophical pragmatism, theorists who insist on the importance of cultivating a new worldview are implicitly committing themselves to some core pragmatic principles, and that the environmental movement will be strengthened by paying explicit attention to these principles and what they mean for environmental theory and practice. The Environmentalist Push for a New Worldview One of the most recurring themes in contemporary environmental theory is the idea that, in order to create a sustainable human society embedded in a flourishing natural environment, we need to change how we think about our relationship with nature. A simple change in public
机译:实用主义,环境世界观和可持续性西雅图大学埃里克·雷坦(Eric Reitan)西雅图大学简介:环境实用主义在过去的几年中,环境哲学家之间就哲学实用主义是否能在环境运动中占有一席之地展开了新的讨论。实用主义是一门独特的美国哲学流派,它粗略地认为,我们的思想,理论和世界观应根据它们对生活经验的影响进行检查和评估,并根据它们如何使我们成功地通过经验进行调整。一些人担心实用主义将所有价值观念植根于人类主观经验的倾向削弱了环保主义者的主张,即我们所有人都应该关心自然,因为自然具有与人类价值活动无关的内在价值。 (Katz 1987)其他人则坚持认为,实用主义倾向于将个人视为与其经验领域(与环境)密不可分的联系,这可以成为引起环境关注的基础。 (Parker 1996)在这些讨论中没有明确指出的是,当前环境理论所倡导的关键思想之一,特别是当代消费主义世界观在很大程度上应归咎于我们当前的环境危机,以及解决这一问题的任何方法。危机必须由世界观的改变来驱动-这本质上是一种务实的想法。我想探索这个事实对那些拥护这个想法的环境理论家的意义。我的建议是,虽然理论家们并没有致力于哲学实用主义的所有传统方面,但他们坚持培养一种新的世界观的重要性,却暗中致力于某些核心的实用主义原则,并且将通过明确关注来加强环境运动。这些原则及其对环境理论和实践的意义。环保主义者推动建立新的世界观当代环境理论中最经常出现的主题之一是,为了创建一个嵌入繁荣的自然环境中的可持续人类社会,我们需要改变对与自然关系的看法。公开更改

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号