首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information >Assessing Crowdsourced POI Quality: Combining Methods Based on Reference Data, History, and Spatial Relations
【24h】

Assessing Crowdsourced POI Quality: Combining Methods Based on Reference Data, History, and Spatial Relations

机译:评估众包POI质量:基于参考数据,历史记录和空间关系的组合方法

获取原文
       

摘要

With the development of location-aware devices and the success and high use of Web 2.0 techniques, citizens are able to act as sensors by contributing geographic information. In this context, data quality is an important aspect that should be taken into account when using this source of data for different purposes. The goal of the paper is to analyze the quality of crowdsourced data and to study its evolution over time. We propose two types of approaches: (1) use the intrinsic characteristics of the crowdsourced datasets; or (2) evaluate crowdsourced Points of Interest (POIs) using external datasets (i.e., authoritative reference or other crowdsourced datasets), and two different methods for each approach. The potential of the combination of these approaches is then demonstrated, to overcome the limitations associated with each individual method. In this paper, we focus on POIs and places coming from the very successful crowdsourcing project: OpenStreetMap. The results show that the proposed approaches are complementary in assessing data quality. The positive results obtained for data matching show that the analysis of data quality through automatic data matching is possible but considerable effort and attention are needed for schema matching given the heterogeneity of OSM and the representation of authoritative datasets. For the features studied, it can be noted that change over time is sometimes due to disagreements between contributors, but in most cases the change improves the quality of the data.
机译:随着位置感知设备的发展以及Web 2.0技术的成功和大量使用,市民能够通过贡献地理信息来充当传感器。在这种情况下,将数据源用于不同目的时,数据质量是重要的方面。本文的目的是分析众包数据的质量并研究其随时间的演变。我们提出两种类型的方法:(1)利用众包数据集的内在特征;或(2)使用外部数据集(即权威参考或其他众包数据集)以及每种方法的两种不同方法来评估众包兴趣点(POI)。然后展示了这些方法组合的潜力,以克服与每种方法相关的局限性。在本文中,我们重点介绍来自非常成功的众包项目OpenStreetMap的POI和场所。结果表明,所提出的方法是评估数据质量的补充。数据匹配获得的积极结果表明,通过自动数据匹配来分析数据质量是可能的,但是鉴于OSM的异构性和权威数据集的表示,模式匹配需要大量的精力和精力。对于所研究的特征,可以注意到,有时随着时间的变化是由于贡献者之间的分歧,但是在大多数情况下,这种变化可以改善数据的质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号