...
首页> 外文期刊>Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity >Exponential Separations between Restricted Resolution and Cutting Planes Proof Systems
【24h】

Exponential Separations between Restricted Resolution and Cutting Planes Proof Systems

机译:受限分辨率和切割平面验证系统之间的指数分隔

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We prove an exponential lower bound for tree-like Cutting Planes refutations of a set of clauses which has polynomial size resolution refutations. This implies an exponential separation between tree-like and dag-like proofs for both Cutting Planes and resolution; in both cases only superpolynomial separations were known before. In order to prove this, we extend the lower bounds on the depth of monotone circuits of Raz and McKenzie (FOCS 97) to monotone real circuits. In the case of resolution, we further improve this result by giving an exponential separation of tree-like resolution from (dag-like) regular resolution proofs. In fact, the refutation provided to give the upper bound respects the stronger restriction of being a Davis-Putnam resolution proof. This extends the corresponding superpolynomial separation of Urquhart (BSL 1995). Finally, we prove an exponential separation between Davis-Putnam resolution and unrestricted resolution proofs; only a superpolynomial separation was previously known (Goerdt, Ann. Math. AI 1992).
机译:我们证明了具有多项式大小分辨率的一组子句的树状切面反演的指数下界。这意味着对于“切割平面”和分辨率,树状样样和dag样样之间的指数分隔;在这两种情况下,以前只知道超多项式分离。为了证明这一点,我们将Raz和McKenzie(FOCS 97)的单调电路深度的下限扩展到了单调真实电路。在分辨率的情况下,我们通过将树状分辨率与(dag状)常规分辨率证明进行指数分离来进一步改善此结果。实际上,提供上限的驳斥是对作为Davis-Putnam分辨率证明的更严格的限制。这扩展了相应的Urquhart超多项式分离(BSL 1995)。最后,我们证明了Davis-Putnam分辨率与无限制分辨率证明之间的指数分隔;以前只知道超多项式分离(Goerdt,Ann。Math。AI 1992)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号