首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced by CEREC Omnicam and Heat-Pressed Technique
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Strength of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced by CEREC Omnicam and Heat-Pressed Technique

机译:CEREC Omnicam和热压技术生产的不同陶瓷嵌体的边缘适应性和断裂强度的比较评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal adaptation and fracture strength of inlays produced by CEREC Omnicam using different types of blocs and heat-pressed technique. Methods Seventy-five extracted human mandibular molars were divided randomly into 5 groups (). 60 molars in four groups received MOD inlay preparations. Experimental groups were CO Intact teeth, EC IPS e.max CAD and CEREC, LU Lava Ultimate and CEREC, EL IPS Empress CAD and CEREC, EP IPS Empress Esthetic ingots and heat-pressed technique. Marginal gap measurements were taken with a stereomicroscope. Restorations were cemented with Variolink N and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. All samples were subjected to thermocycling. The fracture strength of specimens was determined at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. Fracture modes were determined. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance for fracture strength data and Kruskal–Wallis for marginal gap data (). Results. The mean marginal gap size of EC, LU, EL, and EP were 33.54?μm, 33.77?μm, 34.23?μm, and 85.34?μm, respectively. EP had statistically higher values than other groups. The fracture strength values were significantly higher in the intact teeth group (3959,00?±?1279,79?N) than those of restored groups EC (2408,00?±?607,97?N), LU (2206,73?±?675,16), EL (2573.27?±?644,73) ve EP (2879,53?±?897,30). Conclusion. Inlays fabricated using CEREC Omnicam demonstrated better marginal adaptation than inlays produced with heat-pressed technique, whereas fracture strength values of inlays fabricated with different type of blocks using CEREC Omnicam exhibited similarity to those fabricated with heat-pressed technique.
机译:目的。这项体外研究的目的是评估CEREC Omnicam使用不同类型的团块和热压技术生产的嵌体的边缘适应性和断裂强度。方法将75例提取的人类下颌磨牙随机分为5组。四组中的60颗磨牙接受了MOD镶嵌准备。实验组为CO完好牙齿,EC IPS e.max CAD和CEREC,LU Lava Ultimate和CEREC,EL IPS Empress CAD和CEREC,EP IPS Empress美容锭和热压技术。用体视显微镜测量边缘间隙。将修复体与Variolink N粘合在一起,并在37°C的蒸馏水中存储24小时。所有样品均进行热循环。在十字头速度为0.5?mm / min时测定试样的断裂强度,直至断裂。确定了断裂模式。使用单向方差分析获得断裂强度数据,使用Kruskal-Wallis进行边缘间隙数据进行统计分析()。结果。 EC,LU,EL和EP的平均边际间隙尺寸分别为33.54?μm,33.77?μm,34.23?μm和85.34?μm。 EP在统计上高于其他组。完整牙齿组(3959,00±±1279,79?N)的断裂强度值显着高于恢复牙齿组(2408,00±±607.97?N),LU(2206,73)的断裂强度值。 α(±675,16),EL(2573.27±±644,73)和EP(2879,53±±897,30)。结论。使用CEREC Omnicam制造的嵌体显示出比热压技术生产的嵌体更好的边缘适应性,而使用CEREC Omnicam用不同类型的砌块制造的嵌体的断裂强度值与使用热压技术制造的相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号