...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability >Who benefits from seafood trade? A comparison of social and market structures in small-scale fisheries
【24h】

Who benefits from seafood trade? A comparison of social and market structures in small-scale fisheries

机译:谁从海鲜贸易中受益?小型渔业的社会和市场结构比较

获取原文

摘要

We examine the benefits flowing from a coastal seascape through seafood trade to various social groups in two distinct small-scale fishery case studies. A knowledge gap currently exists in relation to how benefits from a fishery, and the associated trade, are ultimately distributed, specifically, how market structures and relations, and the combined dynamics of the local fishing society, can mediate these flows. Previous research into improved fisheries governance for food and livelihood security has failed to integrate the structure of the market place as well as the multidimensional nature of actor relations that influence extractive behavior. Using a value chain framework, we take a relational approach to study these gaps. Surveys were conducted in two fisheries (Zanzibar and the Philippines) as part of a comparative analysis including market-types, assistance networks, and income inequality. Chain structures, gender roles, and levels of contractualization within the two cases differed vastly, appearing to give rise to different types of income inequalities and barriers to participation. In the Philippines economic exchanges revolve more around provision of financial capital, although in both systems social standing and obligations play a role in determining market structures. In Zanzibar trading agents engaging customers in predetermined sale arrangements earn relatively more than their counterpart freelancers, however at the production level no income differences are seen between those with or without arrangements. Both cases stand to be further integrated into the international seafood market, which raises questions over how certain actors will benefit, based on their current participation and access. Results emphasize the need for more evidence in regards to benefits flows and how aspects such as gender and transaction forms impact them. This is necessary for governance decisions around fisheries, poverty alleviation, and increased global market integration.
机译:在两个截然不同的小型渔业案例研究中,我们研究了从沿海海景通过海产品贸易到各个社会群体的收益。当前关于如何分配渔业和相关贸易的利益的最终分配存在知识差距,特别是市场结构和关系以及当地渔业社会的综合动力如何介导这些流量。先前针对改善粮食和民生安全的渔业治理的研究未能整合市场结构以及影响采掘行为的参与者关系的多维性质。使用价值链框架,我们采用关系方法来研究这些差距。作为比较分析的一部分,对两个渔业(桑给巴尔和菲律宾)进行了调查,包括市场类型,援助网络和收入不平等。两种情况下的链结构,性别角色和契约化程度差异很大,似乎导致了不同类型的收入不平等和参与障碍。在菲律宾,经济交流更多地围绕提供金融资本而进行,尽管在这两个系统中,社会地位和义务在确定市场结构方面都发挥着作用。在桑给巴尔,让客户参与预定销售安排的贸易代理人的收入要比其自由职业者相对多,但是在生产水平上,无论有无安排,代理商之间的收入差异都没有。这两种情况都将进一步融入国际海产品市场,这将对某些行为者根据其当前的参与和获取途径将如何受益提出疑问。结果强调需要更多有关福利流动以及性别和交易形式等方面如何影响福利的证据。这对于围绕渔业,减轻贫困和增强全球市场一体化的治理决策而言是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号