...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Assessing the effects of the first 2 years of industry-led badger culling in England on the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle in 2013?¢????2015
【24h】

Assessing the effects of the first 2 years of industry-led badger culling in England on the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle in 2013?¢????2015

机译:评估2013年英格兰行业领导的badge繁殖的前2年对牛的牛结核病发病率的影响?2015年

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Culling badgers to control the transmission of bovine tuberculosis (TB) between this wildlife reservoir and cattle has been widely debated. Industry-led culling began in Somerset and Gloucestershire between August and November 2013 to reduce local badger populations. Industry-led culling is not designed to be a randomized and controlled trial of the impact of culling on cattle incidence. Nevertheless, it is important to monitor the effects of the culling and, taking the study limitations into account, perform a cautious evaluation of the impacts. A standardized method for selecting areas matched to culling areas in factors found to affect cattle TB risk has been developed to evaluate the impact of badger culling on cattle TB incidence. The association between cattle TB incidence and badger culling in the first 2 years has been assessed. Descriptive analyses without controlling for confounding showed no association between culling and TB incidence for Somerset, or for either of the buffer areas for the first 2 years since culling began. A weak association was observed in Gloucestershire for Year 1 only. Multivariable analysis adjusting for confounding factors showed that reductions in TB incidence were associated with culling in the first 2 years in both the Somerset and Gloucestershire intervention areas when compared to areas with no culling (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72?¢????0.87, p < .001 and IRR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34?¢????0.51, p < .001, respectively). An increase in incidence was associated with culling in the 2-km buffer surrounding the Somerset intervention area (IRR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09?¢????1.75, p = .008), but not in Gloucestershire (IRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77?¢????1.07, p = .243). As only 2 intervention areas with 2 years of data are available for analysis, and the biological cause?¢????effect relationship behind the statistical associations is difficult to determine, it would be unwise to use these findings to develop generalizable inferences about the effectiveness of the policy at present.
机译:摘要剔除badge来控制这种野生动物水库与牛之间的牛结核病(TB)传播。为了减少当地badge的种群数量,2013年8月至11月间,在萨默塞特郡和格洛斯特郡开始了以行业为主导的剔除工作。行业主导的剔除并非旨在对剔除对牛发病率的影响进行随机对照试验。然而,重要的是监视剔除的效果,并考虑到研究的局限性,对影响进行谨慎的评估。已开发出一种标准方法,用于选择发现影响牛结核病风险的因素中与淘汰区相匹配的区域,以评估r淘汰对牛结核病发病率的影响。已经评估了头2年中牛结核病发病率与badge淘汰之间的关联。在不控制混杂因素的情况下进行的描述性分析显示,萨默塞特地区或自淘汰开始后的头两年,两个缓冲区中的任何一个地区的地区淘汰与结核病发病率之间均无关联。仅在格洛斯特郡观察到弱关联,仅一年级。校正混杂因素的多变量分析表明,与不进行扑灭的地区相比,萨默塞特郡和格洛斯特郡干预地区的结核病发病率降低与前两年的扑灭有关(发生率(IRR):0.79,95%CI:分别为0.72≤0.87,p <.001和IRR:0.42,95%CI:0.34≤0.51,p <.001)。发病率的增加与在萨默塞特郡干预区周围2公里缓冲区中的剔除有关(IRR:1.38,95%CI:1.09≤1.75,p = 0.008),但在格洛斯特郡却没有(IRR: 0.91,95%CI:0.77≤1.07,p = 0.243。由于只有2个具有2年数据的干预区域可供分析,并且统计关联背后的生物学原因之间的关系很难确定,因此,利用这些发现来得出关于该因素的一般性推论是不明智的。目前该政策的有效性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号