...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability >The squeaky wheel gets the grease? The conflict imperative and the slow fight against environmental injustice in northern Peruvian Amazon
【24h】

The squeaky wheel gets the grease? The conflict imperative and the slow fight against environmental injustice in northern Peruvian Amazon

机译:吱吱作响的车轮上有油脂?秘鲁北部亚马逊河地区的当务之急是应对环境不公正的斗争缓慢

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We chronicle a four-decades-long struggle that has been taking place in the Peruvian Amazon between indigenous groups, oil companies, and the state. We provide a broad overview of the strategies of the communities in the area, juxtaposing the outcomes of different negotiating strategies. In addition to documenting what is an especially important case of socio-environmental conflict in the Peruvian Amazon, we go beyond the dominant approach in the literature, which sees dialogue as inherently desirable and conflict as necessarily unwelcome, and describe the Achuar decision to engage in open conflict with the oil company as one that testifies to the existence of a conflict imperative. In other words, the overcoming of environmental injustice in certain circumstances requires various forms of direct action that take grievance and complaint to the level of open conflict. The corollary of this hypothesis is that dialogue is sometimes neither peaceful nor useful for affected communities. This calls for a rethinking of the boundaries between conflict and negotiation. In our chronicle, conflict itself was often the antecedent to a new round of dialogue and negotiation made possible by the presence of government officials purposively and urgently dispatched to the area. Echoing Clausewitzs famous dictum concerning the continuity between war and policy, indigenous decisions to occupy, blockade, and disrupt the working of oil operations might tentatively be understood as an attempt to continue negotiating with the state and corporations by using other tools they have at their disposal.
机译:我们记载了秘鲁亚马逊土著社区,石油公司和国家之间长达四个十年的斗争。我们提供该地区社区策略的广泛概述,将不同谈判策略的结果并列。除了记录秘鲁亚马逊地区社会环境冲突的一个特别重要的案例外,我们还超越了文献研究中的主流方法,该方法认为对话本质上是可取的,而冲突则必然是不受欢迎的,并描述了Achuar参与其中的决定。与石油公司的公开冲突,证明存在必要的冲突。换句话说,在某些情况下要克服环境不公,就需要采取各种形式的直接行动,使人们的不满和抱怨达到公开冲突的程度。这种假设的推论是,对话有时对受影响的社区既不和平也不有益。这就要求重新考虑冲突与谈判之间的界限。在我们的编年史中,冲突本身常常是新一轮对话和谈判的先决条件,这是有目的和紧急地派往该地区的政府官员在场的结果。呼应克劳塞维茨关于战争与政策之间的连续性的著名格言,将占领,封锁和破坏石油业务的工作的土著决策暂定理解为试图通过使用他们掌握的其他工具继续与国家和公司进行谈判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号