...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosphere >Limited potential of deep reefs to serve as refuges for tropical Southwestern Atlantic corals
【24h】

Limited potential of deep reefs to serve as refuges for tropical Southwestern Atlantic corals

机译:深珊瑚礁作为西南大西洋热带珊瑚庇护所的潜力有限

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The deep reef refuge hypothesis ( DRRH ) predicts that deep coral reefs may act as refuges against major disturbances affecting shallow reefs, but to date, a few studies have explicitly examined its validity at the community level. We sampled 19 Brazilian reefs distributed between 3 and 61?m depth and tested five DRRH predictions regarding species diversity, distribution, and functional profile of communities. The first prediction was that deep reefs (&30?m depth) should host greater gamma diversity to be able to export species to shallow reefs (&30?m). Second, depth‐generalist species should dominate the shallow reefs; otherwise, local extirpation in shallow areas could not be reverted by the deep reefs. Third, alpha diversity should be greater in deep reefs due to reduced anthropogenic pressure in deeper areas. Fourth, beta diversity should be smaller among shallow than deep reefs due to the human‐induced spread of a few disturbance‐adapted species near sea surface. Finally, the functional composition of shallow reefs should be a subset from that of deep reefs to allow functional recovering of shallower areas. Contrary to expectations, coral communities presented twice more gamma diversity in shallow than deep reefs (13 vs. seven effective species) and only three out of 17 species occurred along the entire gradient. Additionally, the alpha diversity of rare, typical, and dominant species was similar between shallow and deep reefs, and the beta diversity of rare and typical species was about 50% greater in shallow than deep reefs. Supporting the DRRH , coral communities of both reefs were dominated by reef‐building, zooxanthellated, gonochoric corals with brooding or broadcast reproductive mode (Siderastrea stellata and Montastraea cavernosa ). However, soft corals were observed only in shallow reefs and azooxanthellated corals were recorded only in deep reefs. These findings revealed a limited potential of deep reefs to serve as refuges for Southwestern Atlantic coral communities, though they may work for two depth‐generalist dominant species. We strongly recommend preventing human disturbances at any depth and including both shallow and deep reefs in regional conservation actions.
机译:深礁避难所假说(DRRH)预测,深珊瑚礁可能充当抵御影响浅礁的主要干扰的避难所,但迄今为止,一些研究已明确地在社区一级检查了其有效性。我们对分布在3到61?m深度之间的19个巴西珊瑚礁进行了采样,并测试了5种DRRH关于物种多样性,分布和群落功能概况的预测。第一个预测是,深礁(>30μm的深度)应具有更大的伽马多样性,以便能够将物种输出到浅礁(<30μm)。第二,深度绅士物种应主导浅礁。否则,深礁无法恢复浅水区的局部灭绝。第三,由于更深区域的人为压力降低,深礁中的α多样性应更大。第四,由于人为导致一些适应干扰的物种在海面附近传播,因此浅礁中的β多样性应小于深礁。最后,浅礁的功能成分应是深礁的功能成分的一部分,以允许较浅区域的功能恢复。与预期相反,浅层珊瑚礁的伽玛多样性是深层珊瑚的两倍(13种相对于7种有效物种),而17种物种中只有3种发生在整个梯度上。此外,浅礁和深礁之间的稀有,典型和优势种的α多样性相似,而浅礁比深礁的稀有和典型种的β多样性高约50%。支持DRRH,两个珊瑚礁的珊瑚群落都以造礁或繁殖繁殖方式( Siderastrea stellata和 Montastraea cavernosa)造礁,人畜共患的,线虫性珊瑚为主。但是,仅在浅礁中观察到软珊瑚,仅在深礁中观察到了偶氮氧杂化的珊瑚。这些发现表明,深礁在西南大西洋珊瑚群落中具有作为避难所的潜力有限,尽管它们可能对两种深度贵族统治的物种起作用。我们强烈建议在区域保护行动中防止任何深度的人为干扰,包括浅礁和深礁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号